The Dickinson Statement
A MIND BOGGLING THESIS
Ian E Stephens
Brings some of the more sensational anecdotes about
FLUORIDES/FLUORIDATION into alarming perspective
2013 Expanded Edition
The Dickinson Statement
by Ian E Stephens
First published by the author in October 1987.
Republished following the 25th anniversary as an expanded edition of the original,
by the Australian Anti-Fluoridation Association (AAFA).
The Contents of this publication are copyright © 2013.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, no part may be reproduced by any process without the written permission of the publisher. That is not to imply that such permission will not be forthcoming.
Further to the original copyright notice, this publication may be distributed freely online in the public interest. For printed copies, a nominal fee may be charged to cover costs.
For printed copies, contact the Australian Anti-Fluoridation Association: www.fluoridationnews.com (or search for The Australian Fluoridation News)
GPO Box 935 Melbourne VIC 3001
“Never have I read such logical, thought provoking statements as those in (the) classic booklet ‘THE DICKINSON STATEMENT'”
– Glen C Dettman, AMM, BA, PhD,
FAPM, FACBS, FIST, FRSH, FMTA (HK), FRMS
“This author would have to rank as one of Australia’s best exponents of the exposé.
This title explores the mind boggling thesis of the MASS TRANQUILISATION OF THE MASSES BY FLUORIDATION OF DRINKING WATER. A political exposé of enormous dimensions.”
– Veritas Press (Australia)
“… it is important to appreciate that the first symptoms of exposure to many toxic chemicals are not physiological but psychological and include such symptoms as confusion, personality changes, fatigue, loss of memory and mental dullness. Or, to put it another way, behaviour is exquisitely sensitive to toxic substances in the environment.”
– Australian Medical Journal, by Dr Stephen Boyden, Australian National University
Foreword to this 2013 Edition* i About The Author* iii Foreword to the 1987 Edition 1 G Edward Griffin 2 Dedication 3 Why The Title? 4 “Perkins” 5 Induced Apathy 6 The Cartel 8 Foundations 10 So What? 14 A Multi-National Can Of Worms 16 It Really Gets In! 17 Fluorinated Propellants 18 Fluoridated Pharmaceuticals 20 Fluorinated Tranquillisers 22 Fluorinated Inhalation Anaesthetics 24 Fluorinated Exterminators 26 Further References 29 Additional References* 29 Epilogue 30 Conclusion 30 Graphic Fluoride Images 31 An Australian Death Certificate 32 Original Back Cover (1987) 33 Appendix 1: Science and Medicine* 34 Appendix 2: “SIDS” Press Release (1984)* 36 Appendix 3: “Fluorine” (1988)* 39 Appendix 4: Selected Quotations* 41
FOREWORD TO THIS 2013 EDITION
Ian E Stephens’ The Dickinson Statement is as relevant now as when it was first published in 1987.
In 1995, Nexus magazine printed The Dickinson Statement “Mind Control of the Masses”, in two parts, copies of which continue to be available online.
This extended edition is based on the 1987 original, with minor edits for clarity and some extra references, an “About The Author” section and additional information throughout, as indicated with this current (sans serif) font, square brackets and asterisks[*]. Correspondence (letters) were recreated with scanned images and signatures from Ian E. Stephens’ original masters (held on file).
Since the original publication, the fluoridation landscape has changed:
● Many more fluoride chemicals are used today resulting in more pollution
● Many European cities completed their testing of fluoridation, and for various reasons removed the last vestiges of water fluoridation from their countries e.g. Basel, Switzerland in 2003 after 40 years of testing showed no benefit to teeth
● Meanwhile, artificial water fluoridation has become even more widespread in a number of countries. In Australia, the most recent estimate is 85 to 90%, as governments and bureaucrats continue to misinform their populations and forcibly mass-medicate them, dismissing basic medical ethics and denying citizens the freedom to choose for themselves
● More science continues to come in: fluoride accumulates in the brain’s pineal gland, hip and bones fractures are much higher in fluoridated communities, the US Government’s NIDR study (obtained in 1990 under Freedom of Information) showed that fluorides do NOT prevent dental decay
● In 2006, the US National Research Council (NRC) Report set official alarm bells ringing on many fronts. The American Dental Association responded by declaring: “Infants less than one year old may be getting more than the optimal amount of fluoride (which may increase their risk of enamel fluorosis) if their primary source of nutrition is powdered or liquid concentrate infant formula mixed with water containing fluoride.” We’d add that the “optimal” amount of fluoride is as close to zero as you can get. Note also that the Australian Dental Association has not recommended any changes to policy
● Thirty six studies now indicate that fluorides are neurotoxic and lower IQ. Fluoride exposure among children causes problems with cognitive
development and brain formation. Some of the studies indicate that even a slightly increased fluoride exposure could be neurotoxic
● Further, from the Blaylock Wellness Report (Sept 2004): “An article in the journal ‘Epidemiology’ showed that children drinking water with US EPA- approved fluoride levels had problems with reading and writing”
● And so an increasing number of scientific nails are ready and available for the fluoridation coffin for when this disastrous industrial waste disposal scheme, masquerading as a health solution, is finally buried.
One thing that hasn’t changed is fluoridation’s infringement on our personal right to choose what we eat and drink and what medications we take.
The current state of play (2013) is that all Australian capital cities, as well as many regional cities and towns, are now fluoridated with industrial byproducts, either sodium fluoride, or sodium silicofluoride with hexafluorosilicic acid: Hobart in 1964, Canberra 1964, Perth 1968, Sydney 1968, Adelaide 1971, Darwin 1972, Melbourne 1977, Brisbane 2009. But despite this, all is not ‘lost’ – unless we give up totally! Remember the cities/towns that have managed to stop or prevent deadly fluoridation, e.g. Carnarvon’s and Queensland’s recent victories.
For those wanting a totally clean water environment now (which is a must if you want to grow your own healthy vegies), have a talk with or write to your local water authority. Melbourne, for example, has communities on its outskirts where you and your children can safely drink and bathe in clean fluoride free water. Both Healesville and Yarra Glen have a filtered and lightly chlorinated water supply, whilst that of the Upper Yarra valley is disinfected with UV and lightly chlorinated. (This applies to settlements from Woori Yallock right up to East Warburton.) Another group of communities share a chloraminated (chlorine and ammonia) supply. These include Kallista, The Patch, Clematis, Emerald, Avonsleigh, Macclesfield, Cockatoo and Gembrook. You WILL find towns and communities around Australia that are unfluoridated. So when you’re looking to buy or lease your next home, do the research and vote with your feet.
You, the reader, must do your own research, become sufficiently informed on the subject and make your own choices. Minimise the fluoride intake for yourself and your family. Be positive and believe with absolute knowingness that the pestilence of fluoridation will end. Until then, play your part and inform others in a positive, constructive and kind way.
This impressive and memorable publication will help toward that end. Australian Anti-Fluoridation Association, November 2013
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Ian Edward Stephens was born in Melbourne on the 8 December 1921. His father was a Presbyterian minister and the family’s early years were spent in various locations in Victoria.
He studied mechanical engineering and did his part for the war effort with aircraft/bomber modification work. He married Margaret (Peggy) Buchan in 1943 and they had four sons. Both Ian and Peggy were first generation Australians, the parents of both being Scottish immigrants.
They bought and developed some land in Mitcham and ran a successful plant nursery from 1950 to 1982. In later years due to Ian’s illness, this became Peggy’s task.
Ian also worked as an industrial machinery rep and later oversaw the building of the Nubrick brickworks east of Melbourne. Ian spent much time helping his sons design and build their own homes, using his structural and organising abilities to the fullest.
Ian loved flying, obtaining his pilot’s licence later in life. He also enjoyed skiing at Mt Buller, fishing and clay shooting.
As he grew older, Ian developed acute asthma. It wasn’t so much that he smoked 60 cigarettes a day for 35 years but that he had helped one of his sons clear blackberries on his farm and repeatedly came home drenched, much to Peggy’s dismay, in DDT and other herbicides. In the sixties there were no warnings on these deadly chemicals. The resultant problems were later exacerbated by an over administration of cortisone, resulting in the iatrogenic worsening of an already bad situation.
During his last ten years he devoted much time and energy to helping communities, especially in Australia, to understand fluoridation, immunisation and the dangers of pesticides. He was an avid letter writer, writing without fear or favour, and was particularly concerned with the welfare of his fellow man. He wrote to all the leaders of the land, to newspapers, scientific organisations and journals, and delighted readers with witty, informing and acerbic letters that easily interpreted complex information and got straight to the point.
As Ian’s health deteriorated markedly, he was bedridden for the last two years of his life. Energies that would have been spent on physical work were now channelled into writing and researching. He did all he could, producing such booklets as Asthma: the Way Back, Shot To Hell (on vaccination) and View of the
World (on those who control the world, as well as the safe use of chemicals and pesticides). And of course, this booklet, The Dickinson Statement.
He passed away on the 5th August 1989, aged 67.
Ian is remembered by many around the world and in Australia, by the people he helped with his valued and heartfelt contributions. He was missed greatly by best friend and fellow activist, the late Glen SR Walker who outlived him by 20 years.
Given Ian’s capacity for scientific research and the value of his contribution, Drs Archie Kalokerinos and Glen Dettman had, a few months before he died, bestowed upon their friend and colleague the honorary title of ‘MG’ (Medical Genius) and said after losing him that “we will miss his penetrating written missiles and the ever-ready help he could provide, but we know that he would have us all maintain our rage and continue the fight against the many injustices inflicted upon an innocent population.”
FOREWORD TO THE 1987 EDITION
Because his book, World Without Cancer contained considerable research by the author, G Edward Griffin, into the dark recesses of the pharmaceutical industry, research which confirmed in no small measure this thesis, a draft copy went to him. His comment is reproduced on the facing page as a concise ‘foreword’.
G Edward Griffin is well known because of his unique talent for researching obscure and difficult topics and presenting them in clear, precise terms that all can understand. He is the author of numerous documentary books and films on such diversified and controversial subjects as the United Nations, the Supreme Court, the John Birch Society, the Communist Party, US foreign policy, international banking [*the Federal Reserve], and in World Without Cancer, the science and politics of Cancer therapy.
He is a graduate of the University of Michigan and is currently the president of a publishing and audio-visual production company in Southern California.
Ian E Stephens
Mr. Ian Stephens 63 Purches Street Mitcham 3132 Australia
Dear Mr. Stephens,
P.O. Box 4646. Westlake Village, California 91359
This is in reply to your letter of December 3rd.
The information you sent was, indeed, interesting. Frankly, you have gone deeper into the IG Farben/Fluoride connection than I have. I am definitely aware of the fluoride “myth” regarding caries, and I was aware that Farben was involved, but the exact connection and the interlock to the American Foundations is new to me.
Thank you for sending this information.
December 17, 1987
Dedicated to my grandchildren, to their peers and to their offspring with the wish that they will be allowed to build a less corrupt, less greedy society and create a cleaner world.
Ian E Stephens. 1987.
WHY THE TITLE?
“Evil men prosper when good men do nothing” – Edmund Burke
This story has a beginning, it has a middle but it has no ending. The ‘ending’ will undoubtedly be written in countless hospital records, at tiny grave stones, in the bones of the crippled and on the hearts of the bereaved. Even so, the true cause of the ‘ending’ will never be advertised. One record that slipped past the establishment net is duplicated herein but, believe it or not, the existence of this death certificate has been denied, in writing and to overseas scientific inquiry, by Australian administrations.
What follows is but a fractional part of the ‘middle’ of a story that began back before the turn of the [20th] century and which was provoked by a statement contained in an “Address in Reply to the Governor’s speech to the Parliament”, as recorded in Victorian Hansard of 12 August 1987, by Mr Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament for South Barwon. Hence the title.
The relevant HANSARD abstract is reproduced herewith. It is emphasised that the writer imputes Mr Dickinson with no other responsibility for the contents of this thesis than being the Parliamentary ‘trigger’ which activated it and the researched data which it contains.
“At the end of the second world war, the United States Government sent Charles E Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany.
“While there he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war, and adopted by the German General Staff.
“This was to control the population in any given area, through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place.
“Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual’s power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. “Both the Germans and the Russians added sodium fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile.”
In Dr Hans Moolenburgh’s book, Fluoride: The Freedom Fight, the author describes the ultimately successful endeavours to free the Dutch people from water fluoridation. (Those endeavours included the only properly conducted double-blind study ever done anywhere in the world into the effects of fluoridated tap water.)
One brief passage is headed “Perkins”, and a reproduction of that section gives sufficient confirmation, by a remote and independent source, of the “Dickinson Statement” as printed in Hansard, to reinforce the need for additional investigation into this one ‘behaviour control’ aspect of the ‘fluoride debate’ and relate it to 1987. (The entire “Perkins” paragraph is reproduced below.)
Elsewhere in this book, Dr Moolenburgh also relates how that first “Perkins” anecdote was confirmed in differing ways and from reliable independent sources.
“When 1971 was drawing to a close, I received a paper containing a strange story. This story was to haunt us repeatedly throughout the long, drawn-out battle. It was a story resembling science fiction – bizarre and unbelievable. There are those who warned me not to even mention this story, and I can appreciate why. On the other hand, the task of an historian is not to relate things as they should have happened, but as they actually did happen.
“…The Perkins saga was different from other fluoride stories.
“The story of industries hoodwinking the public into buying a pollutant as a medicine is simply ‘whodunnit’. Grotesque though it may sound, it is no more that ‘the consumer fraud of this polluted century’ (as described in Fluoridation and Truth Decay by Gladys Caldwell). But the story I now read was different: it gave one the cold shivers. It told of a chemical engineer, Mr Perkins, who related how immediately after the Second World War he was one the Americans put into the well-known IG Farben Company in Germany. There he discovered that IG Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries, because it had been found that fluoridation caused slight damage to specific parts of the brain. This damage had a very particular effect. It made it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom. He became more docile towards authority.
“Scientists in the camps of both opponents and proponents of fluoride have always dismissed this story as mere poppycock, but it had a life
of its own and reared its head time and again. It fed the suspicions of many people that ‘there was more to fluoridation than meets the eye’.
“As far as I know, there is no one who has done any serious research into whether the fluoridated person is really more docile, easier to rule, more impressed by authority than the non-fluoridated one. There is, though, one peculiar thing: every Dutch doctor has a medical reference book for 1984. One of the chapters is entitled “Tranquillisers”. Looking at the “minor Tranquillisers” I find twenty-four substances: their chemical formulae do not show any connection with fluoride. However, there is also a heading, “major Tranquillisers”. Of those there are twenty-seven, and seven of them are a fluoride compound. One of these is Semap. It is one of the strongest anti-psychotic substances we know. This means that twenty-five per cent of the major Tranquillisers are connected with fluoride. I do not draw any conclusions. The only thing one can say at this point is, with Alice: ‘curiouser and curiouser!'”
“The man in the street does not notice the devil even when the devil is holding him by the throat.” – Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
Actually there is little that is novel in the concept of controlling the minds and manners of the multitude by chemical/dietary means. That it was practised by Hitler’s regime is made the more credible when we know that as far back as 1938 the US Government, then a Hitler ally, and despite being the government of a democratic Christian country, was considering the transformation of American citizens and others into ‘zombies’ by a number of proposed techniques. The US Army searched for “the perfect incapacitating agent”, according to General Fellenz, “to put in the enemy’s water supply”. Included in the drugs tested were the hallucinogenic LSD and the amnesiac BZ (10 times more potent than LSD), and a “schizophrenic agent called bulbocapine”.
The “Rockefeller Report” to the United States President on CIA activities said: “The drug program was part of a much larger CIA program to study possible means of controlling human behaviour”.
One drug which received special attention in the ‘fifties and early ‘sixties, under the cryptonym of MKULTRA, was suxamethonium chloride (listed under a number of product names including Anectine), a halogenated anti-cholinergic agent with all the symptomatic side-effects up to and including cardiac arrest ascribed to these agents in the medical literature.
Please keep the term “anti-cholinergic agent” in mind, for owing to the health implications attendant on this particular anti-metabolic activity, it figures repeatedly in this thesis.
Note: An adviser to the US Government on hypnotism or psychological behaviour control, Dr George Estabrooks, later became Chairman, Department of Psychology, Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains the most ardent producer and advocate for the fluorination of a domestic product – fluoridated toothpaste.
Now, should the reader’s mind be already boggled to the point of disbelief, there are two facts which, if known about and/or remembered, may instil sufficient confidence in that which is even more ‘boggling’ and is yet to come.
Bromine (or bromide) tea was administered to the enlisted men during the First and Second World Wars.
The halogen (bromine) ingredients were said to quell the libido of the men and thus limit likely forays into the ‘dens of iniquity’ and the acquisition of venereal disease.
[* Authorities and their dependent science “experts” tow the official line and are quick to deny or ridicule claims of treating military personnel with bromine. Yet in the field, catering staff have admitted they secretly followed orders to put bromine into the tea urns but didn’t drink it themselves. Bromine affects enzymes affecting hormones and can result in testosterone levels reduced by around 40%.]
The second fact is that, today, all Australian military establishments provide their own halogenated (fluoridated) water for the troops resident therein, for the official reason that the element is good for developing teeth.
[* Australian defence sites are fluoridated, such as Puckapunyal in Victoria which was fluoridated in 1972, the year before the Victorian Fluoridation Act (1973) made it legal to fluoridate. As reported by Dr Phillip Sutton, The Greatest Fraud: Fluoridation (1996), p281, in which he referred to the Australian Journal of Public Administration, Vol. 38, no. 3 (1978)]
Either we have a very immature military force, all under that of twelve years when the mythical effect of fluoride ceases to exist, or else there is another more obscure, less altruistic reason for this drug ‘treatment’ of the troops.
Later on in this text we will recall certain happenings relative to ex-trainees from those establishments and the paradoxical effects of fluorides on the behaviour of humans.
“Historians of the future will marvel most of all at the non-resistance of those who had the most to lose.” – General van Horne Mosley
The Parliamentary “Dickinson Statement” refers to “the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany”. It has been said by Anthony C Sutton in his book, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, “Without the capital supplied by Wall Street, there would have been no IG Farben in the first place, and almost certainly no Adolf Hitler and World War II.”
Interessen Gemeinschaft Farben (Interessen Gemeinschaft der Deutschen Teerfarbeninduistrie, or, simply, IG Farben) was a German chemical manufacturing concern that supplied the chlorine gas used by Germany during the First World War, but the eventual creation of the huge IG Farben cartel began in 1924 when American bankers began to arrange foreign loans in what Professor Carroll Quigley terms “the Dawes Plan”, “largely a JP Morgan production”.
In 1928 Henry Ford merged his German assets with IG Farben, to be followed by the American Standard Oil Company (the Rockefellers) who, in concert with IG Farben, developed the coal-to-oil hydrogenation process.
In a letter to Roosevelt from Berlin in the early ‘thirties, the US Ambassador in Germany, William Dodd, said:
“At the present moment, more than a hundred American corporations have subsidiaries here or cooperative understandings.
“The DuPonts have their allies in Germany that are aiding in the armament business. Their chief ally is the IG Farben Company, a part of the government which gives 200,000 marks a year to one propaganda organization operating on American opinion.
“Standard Oil Company… sent US$500,000 a year helping Germans make ersatz [a substitute] gas [the hydrogenation process of converting coal to gasoline] for war purposes; but Standard Oil cannot take any of its earnings out of the country except in goods.
“The International Harvester Company president told me their business here rose 33% a year [arms manufacture, I believe], they could take nothing out.
“Even our airplanes people have secret arrangements with Krupps.
“General Motors Company and Ford do enormous business here through their subsidiaries and take no profits out.”
The IG Farben assets in America were controlled by a holding company, American IG Farben, which listed on its Board of Directors: Edsel Ford, President of the Ford Motor Company; Chas E Mitchell, President of Rockefeller’s National City Bank of New York; Walter Teagle, President of Standard Oil of New York; Paul Warburg, Chairman of the Federal Reserve and brother of Max Warburg, financier of Germany’s war effort; and Herman Metz, a Director of the Bank of Manhattan, controlled by the Warburgs.
It is an interesting fact of history that three other members of the Board of American IG Farben were tried and convicted as German “war criminals” for their “crimes against humanity” during World War II, while serving on the IG Farben Board of Governors. None of the Americans who sat on the same board as those convicted was ever tried as a “war criminal”.
Throughout the entire second World War conflict, not one bomb fell on the IG Farben headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, allegedly as a consequence of Allied orders.
In 1938, IG Farben borrowed 500 tons of tetra-ethyl lead, the gasoline additive, from Standard Oil. During 1939, the year Germany invaded Austria and Poland, the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey loaned IG Farben US$20,000,000 worth of high-grade gasoline.
In 1939 the American Aluminum Company (Alcoa), then probably the world’s largest producer of sodium fluoride, transferred its technology to Germany (the Alted Agreement). The Dow Chemical Company transmitted its experience and technology in that same period.
Germany’s two largest tank manufacturers were Opel, a subsidiary of General Motors (JP Morgan), and the German subsidiary of the Ford Motor Company.
Even with the purchase of oil from non-German sources, the major supplier of oil was still the Farben cartel. The IG Farben cartel had a monopoly on German gasoline production. Just under one half of the Germans’ high-octane gasoline in 1945 was produced directly by IG Farben, and most of the balance by its affiliated companies.
So, in 1941 when cylinders of Zyklon B, the deadly cyanide-based extermination gas made by IG Farben, were lethally unvalved on inmates of Auschwitz, Bitterfeld, Walfen, Hoechst, Agfa, Ludwigshafen and Buchenwald, there were more than substantial links between huge American technology and German manufacturers.
Two questions must be asked here: (a) Was IG Farben associated with the formulation of Sarin and/or Soman, the German-developed fluorinated nerve
gases that made Zyklon B little more than an underarm deodorant by comparison and (b) What of IG Farben today?
The answer to (a) is an unequivocal yes! As for (b), IG Farben signed cartel agreements with such companies as Imperial Chemical Industries (ICI), Borden, Carnation, General Mill, MW Kellogg Co, Nestlé and Pet Milk, and IG Farben either owns outright, has had a substantial interest in or has had other cartel agreements with Owl Drug, Parke-Davis and Co, Bayer and Co, Whitehall Laboratories, Chef-Boy-Ar-Dee Foods, Bristol Meyers and Squibb and Sons. The list goes on and on and on and includes Proctor and Gamble who ‘domesticated’ the word “fluoride” with official encouragement in 1958, being the originators of the infamous “Crest” fluoridated toothpaste campaign.
The only reference to “Farben” traceable in a limited search of modern literature was in 25th Edition of Martindale, under “FBA Pharmaceutical Limited; Products of Farbenfabriken Bayer”.
All corporate traces of the huge IG cartel have been absorbed by the hundreds, if not thousands, of one-time cartel members, but the ‘malady lingers on’…
“The passion to regulate the lives of others is deep-seated in many individuals. When this is based on political expedience, it is bad, and when it is inspired by idealism which wishes to inflict benefits on others, it can become dangerous.” – Sir Arthur Amies
In Australia, the Dental Health Education and Research Foundation which has such names as Colgate, Kellogg and the ex IG Farben associates listed among its governors and contributors has been irreverently but accurately dubbed “the fluoride mafia”. Closely allied with this Sydney University ‘foundation’, in its printed promotional claims for fluorides and fluoridation, its benefits and its hazards, is “Foundation 41”. Unfortunately the data of the “thorough investigations” said to have been carried out by the latter foundation have never been made available despite numerous appeals. An ABC Science Show’s examination of the scientific integrity of Foundation 41 may explain the elusive (or is the word illusory?) data. [*See “An Australian Example of Fluoridation Dictatorship” in The Australian Fluoridation News, Jan-Mar 2011, p5]
America is literally bursting at the seams with such foundations including The Rockefeller Foundation, The Carnegie Foundation and The Ford Foundation. It is necessary to mention these specifically because they were the
first foundations to make grants in the population (control) field, and the Carnegie family merged with the Mellon family Institute to create the Carnegie-Mellon University in Pittsburgh in 1967.
The Mellon family were the founders of the original Mellon Institute whence came the “amazing (but totally fallacious) sodium fluoride/dental caries prevention discovery” – the discovery that literally turned ‘garbage into gold’. The Mellon family also founded the American Aluminum Company (Alcoa), the largest producer of the waste toxin, sodium fluoride, which, until the felicitous ‘caries discovery’, had relatively little known commercial or industrial value, was an environmental hazard of great public concern, and was very costly in terms of safe disposal.
So we retrace our steps back to the “Dickinson Statement” in Hansard and Chas Eliot Perkins. In a letter abstracted from Fluoridation and Lawlessness (published by the Committee for Mental Health and National Security) to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, on 2nd October 1954, a Charles Eliot Perkins, scientist and author of Washington, DC, and, one must assume, the same Charles Eliot Perkins of the “Dickinson Statement” to the Victorian Parliament, said this (and the words of the last two lines of the second paragraph [*in bold] cannot be overemphasised):
“We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullibility of the public and the cupidity of public officials that is responsible for the present spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country.
“However – and I want to make this very definite and positive – the real reason behind water fluoridation not to benefit children’s teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done which are much easier, cheaper and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty…
“When the Nazis, under Hitler, decided to go into Poland… the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communise the world …
“I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, bio-chemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine: any person who drinks artificially fluorinated
water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.”
Mr Perkins does not involve America, American institutions or individuals in his assertions, but when Major George Racy Jordan was in charge of the massive ‘lend-lease airlift’ operations from Great Falls, Montana, to Russia via Alaska, he queried the trans-shipment of considerable amounts of sodium fluoride via Fairbanks, Alaska, to Russia. He was told “frankly” that it was to put into the drinking water in the prisoner-of-war camps to take away their will to resist.
The published knowledge that sodium fluoride was known for this mind – and behaviour – changing potential was available at the start of this [20th] century, as witness such entries as “Fluoricum Acidum” (Encyclopedia of Pure ‘Materia Medica’, vol. ix, p. 333).
America has long been interested in behaviour and mind control by chemical means. Americans who were at once financiers, industrialists and population – control advocates were intimately involved with Germany where chemical extermination and chemical behaviour control by, inter alia, sodium fluoride, were placed into practice. America transferred this knowledge and material, inter alia, to Russia during its ‘lend-lease’ co-operation. An American major producer of aluminium was the world’s major source of sodium fluoride. American ‘education and research’ funded by (a) the major sodium fluoride producer, and (b) a ‘foundation’ involved in population control, was the origin of ‘the dental caries prevention myth’ associated with sodium fluoride.
A predominantly American company was the first to exploit this concept in dentifrice production, and American ‘medical research’ figured largely in the ‘fluorination’ processes that converted the negative embarrassment of mounting industrial waste to huge positive profit increases – processes that other countries hastened to emulate; processes which include the enormous outlet for fluorides in the fluoridation of water supplies.
Although fertiliser production has not been a part of this thesis, the following ‘connections’ with this point should be made. The manufacturing processes for synthetic dyes, explosives and fertiliser are almost chemically synonymous, and IG Farben was expert in all production phases of these ‘necessities’. Sodium silicofluoride was a waste constituent from the refining of phosphate rock, until a ‘use’ could be found or created for the waste.
A letter (reproduced on the following page) from the United States Environmental Protection Agency throws the spotlight on the unique ‘waste disposal via the public kidney’ concept that was created.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460
Leslie A. Russell, D.M.D. 363 Walnut Street Newtonville, Mass. 02160
Dear Dr Russell:
Thank you for you letter of March 9, 1983, in regard to the fluoridation of drinking water.
The information available to the Environmental Protection Agency is that fluoridation is a safe and effective means for reducing the occurrence of dental caries. The fluoridation process has been endorsed by several Presidents of the United States and by several Surgeons General, including the current Surgeon General, Dr C. Everett Koop. A copy of Dr Koop’s statement on fluoridation is enclosed.
Water treatment chemicals, including fluosilicic acid, have been evaluated for their potential for contributing to the contamination of drinking water. The Water Treatment Chemicals Codex, published by the National Academy of Sciences, prescribes the purity requirement for fluosilicic acid and other fluoridation chemicals.
In regard to the use of fluosilicic acid as a source of fluoride for fluoridation, this Agency regards such use as an
ideal environmental solution to a long-standing problem. By recovering by-product fluosilicic acid from fertilizer manufacturing, water and air pollution are minimized, and water utilities have a low-cost source of fluoride available to them. I hope this information adequately responds to your concern.
OFFICE OF WATER
“It was always tempting to override
the people and impose a new order.” – Sir Rupert Hamer
The question raised by the Hansard “Dickinson Statement”, and perhaps aggravated by this dissertation and data, is this: Was the Australian Government, in 1962-3 when it illegally (Australian Constitution, Section 51 [xxiiiA]) introduced “fluoridation of water supplies” to Australia, aware of its grotesque actions and of the grave results? The ‘shonky’ method of introducing, plus legal and official correspondence at that time, indicates in the affirmative.
Was the Crisp Royal Commission [*Tasmania 1968], when it ‘found’ in favour of fluoridation, and, incidentally, in favour of the major polluter and producer of fluoride in Tasmania (Electrolytic Zinc Corp, Risdon, Hobart), aware of the consequences of any such favourable findings? Conditions then and since mingle with some incredible documented coincidences, and unbelievable but documented official behaviour, including that of premiers and health ministers, and the paucity of current State parliamentary investigations into fluorine-based environment problems, to convince the most sceptical that it was.
The Victorian Premier, Sir Rupert Hamer, [known as Dick Hamer] was later to publicly declare the dictatorial credo, “It was always tempting to override the people and impose a new order”. Was Hamer aware of these background facts when he instituted indemnified water fluoridation legislation and a subsequent fraudulently conceived and executed cover-up “inquiry”? (Ballarat Courier, 6 October 1982) Irrespective of the obviously familial supplier advantages, of which it seems certain that he was so aware? [* As Wendy Varney stated in her 1986 book, “Dick Hamer was the brother of Alan Hamer who was at the time Deputy Chairman of ICI, the company that received the contract for sodium silicofluoride supplies for Melbourne’s water.”] Widespread publicity regarding subsequent alleged complex land company fraud transactions would seemingly underwrite the existence of the necessary character attributes to perform as implied. [* Contrast that with the previous Premier Sir Henry Bolte’s attitude. Sometime around 1988, Mrs Mary Walker said to him: “Excuse me, Sir Henry, I just wish you were still our Premier and we wouldn’t have this rotten fluoridation”, to which Bolte replied: “No, you certainly would NOT, and you wouldn’t have the VEDC either.” (The VEDC, or Victorian Economic Development Corporation, was a government venture capital investment scheme in the 1980s, which wasted millions of taxpayer dollars, and in that sense, was not unlike fluoridation!) ]
Are the lies, denials, fabrications and evasions evident in Geelong with two fluoride pollution sources (aluminium smelting and fertiliser production), and Portland with ditto sources, no more than “job protection” and “rate protection” scares as is claimed, or is there a deeper, wider federal or international instructional background behind the unmonitored pollution, with the health detriment there from and the ‘secrecy legislation’ invoked for the Victorian aluminium industry?
Was Mrs Thatcher’s astronomical expenditure of United Kingdom revenue on a fluoridation campaign in Northern Ireland a matronly concern for the youngsters’ teeth, or perhaps an attempt to sedate the people and render them subservient to her autocratic dictates? Remember this: Mrs Thatcher has a background of academic chemistry and would be far from ignorant of the tranquillising effects of the halogens and their halides.
Similarly, her legal and political shenanigans (that is the only word to describe her behaviour) in the English fluoridation scene offer many avenues for the questioning of her motives.
Are the lies, fabrications, omissions, evasions and official hysteria in the federal government and bureaucracy at the very mention of fluorides, fluoride pollution or water fluoridation, also common to the state governments and bureaucracies, and repeatedly backed up by the most lunatic science (as witness, the ministerially approved and internationally derided propaganda from the National Health Medical Research Council), royal and vice-regal intransigence, a frightening exhibition of this grim foreknowledge, all of which has abundant documentary support, or simply no more than dastardly coincidence?
[* Further on the subject of Germany, Russia and fluoridation, a brief quote from the late Glen Walker, published in The Australian Fluoridation News of April-June 2009: “There’s virtually no fluoridation in the whole of Europe… When the Russians took over East Germany after WWII – never published in the Australian Press anywhere – but what was the first thing they did? They fluoridated East Germany’s water supply. When finally the Berlin Wall was pulled down and Western Germany incorporated East Germany, what was the first thing they did? They cut the fluoridation out. There’s no fluoridation in Europe… And yet, in Australia, the people are not allowed to know anything about the known and UNKNOWN problems associated with sodium silicofluoride.”
In addition to Soviet bloc communist countries fluoridating after WWII, additional curiosities include other fluoridated “trouble-spots” such as the region in Spain occupied by the Basque separatists, South Africa after the fall of Apartheid, West Papua, and newly-fluoridated Fiji (where only fluoridated toothpastes are allowed on shop shelves!) Why are these areas now fluoridated? Astute readers will reach their own conclusions.]
A MULTI-NATIONAL CAN OF WORMS
“The smallest worm will turn, being trodden on.”
– King Henry VI, Shakespeare
The link between Colgate and ‘mind control’ was mentioned earlier. That company’s reputation with fluoride as a toothpaste ingredient is a promotional legend, particularly in Kenya where a ban on the TV advertising of fluorinated toothpaste produced some extraordinary pecuniary persuasion from Colgate in attempts to preserve the ‘status quo’ for the company’s benefit.
When official fluoridation corruption was exposed in New Zealand a ‘scientific study’ was hurriedly executed to try and justify the original government/industry claims and repair the damage done to the fluoride empire. The accreditation appended to that study is reproduced here with emphasis added:
We are grateful to the Director and staff of the Division of Dental Health, Department of Health for the administrative and logistic support in the Auckland area. In particular we wish to mention Supervising Dental Nurses R Patchett and K Hyde, and assistant V Clarke for their excellent arrangements and help in contacting, screening, and arranging the transportation of children to the examination centres. Mr Garth Stewart, bus driver, contributed much above and beyond his normal duties. The tremendous help and co-operation from principals and staff of all schools is most appreciated.
Financial support for this study was provided by the Colgate Palmolive Company (NZ).
Earlier the name Kellogg was tied into the IG Farben corporate machinations. The words below are reproduced from the cover of a recent World Health Organisation (WHO) publication advocating fluoridation/ fluorides. (Bold added)
Published under the joint sponsorship of the
International Dental Federation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, and the World Health Organization
APPROPRIATE USE OF FLUORIDES FOR HUMAN HEALTH
The intertwining, overlapping, interlocking co-incidence between erstwhile IG Farben companies and the continuing degradation of human health, our ecology and environment in exchange for the corporate dollar is virtually
endless but simply as ONE example. The Nestlé Company, once accused of selling nutritionally barren milk formula to third world babies has recently been found guilty of marketing “Pure Apple Juice” which was anything but “pure” and which had never been anywhere near an apple.
The Nestlé Company has been nominated by The Ecologist as one of several multi-national companies involved in the destruction of the “lungs of the earth”, the Brazilian rain forests.
IT REALLY GETS IN!
“O God that men should put an enemy in their mouths to steal away their brains” – Othello, Shakespeare.
The following pages make a slight transition from historically recorded fact and logic to indisputable fact, bio-chemical fact and medical literature fact.
The pharmaceutical nomenclature and bio-chemical data involves fluorine / fluorides with or without other ingredients, in virtually every phase of mind and behaviour control from mild sedation through ‘controlled’ unconsciousness to death.
‘Side effects’ of all drugs have in common the “paradoxical” characteristic of having an effect, on some individuals, exactly opposite that which was the intentional effect, converting for example, a tranquilliser into a potent stimulant, and thus the consumer from a ‘pussy cat’ into a slavering maniac.
Think back to the dosing of service personnel who are trained to hunt, maim and kill their fellow man while under the influence of this or other forms of chemical behaviour control and consider the possible reaction of such ‘trainees’ when discharged back into the mainstream of society.
Are any of the terrorist activities around the globe, including the otherwise inexplicable recent happenings in Australia [* in 1987, including Melbourne’s ‘Hoddle Street Shootings’ and ‘Queen St Massacre’], the grim result of such a bio-chemical paradox?
FLUORINATED PROPELLANTS (and refrigerants)
The Fluoridated “Hole in the Ozone Layer”
Halogenated hydrocarbons (sometimes called fluorocarbons or, when the name of the weapon must be changed to protect the guilty, just “CFCs”) are too numerous to list, being over 150 in number. In ‘asthma’ sprays the warning exists in all product literature (available only to the doctor, NOT TO THE PATIENT): “Excessive use of such inhalers or abuse of any aerosol propellant may result in toxic effects on the heart and deaths have been reported. (Remember the term ‘anti-cholinergic’)
Another stark warning from ‘restricted distribution’ literature:
“ABUSE. Of 110 deaths associated with the sniffing of solvents between 1962 and 1969, fifty-nine were related to the use of fluorinated aerosol propellants.”
The most frequently used fluorides under this heading (with their identifying number of products in parenthesis) are:
1. TriChloroFluoroMethane (11)
2. DiChloroDiFluoroMethane (12)
3. ChloroTriFluoroMethane (13)
4. TetraFluoroMethane (14)
5. DiChloroFluoroMethane (21)
6. ChloroDiFluoroMethane (22)
7. TetraChloroDiFluoroMethane (112) 8. TriChloroFluoroEthane (113)
9. DiChloroFluoroTetraEthane (114) 10. ChloroPentaFluoroEthane (115)
11. DiFluoroEthane (152a)
The side effects of exposure to these fluorides, ranging from the “more common” to the “rarely reported” are as follows:
Cardiac-toxicity (or heart injury), respiratory depression (or breathing difficulty), bradycardia (or slowed pulse rate), convulsions (or central nervous system effects), psychomotor aberrations (or brain dysfunction), transient sedation (or heart and lung effects), ataxia (or brain problems), irritation of the upper respiratory tract, rise/fall in blood pressure, apnoea (or impaired lung functional damage), tachycardia (or increased pulse rate), broncho-constriction (or ‘ASTHMA’), palpitations (or irregular heart beat), narcosis (or brain
‘drugging’), anaesthesia (or depression of heart, lungs, central nervous system performance), hallucinogenic effects (or brain ‘drugging’ again) and death.
All of the above ‘side effects’ are associated with either the acute or the chronic symptoms of “anti-cholinergic” toxicity. And there is that word “anti-cholinergic” again.
With a sufficient amount of these fluorocarbons (CFCs) being used, in the ‘aerosol’ form alone, to threaten the world’s atmospheric and climatic conditions through deterioration of the ozone layer, it is not remarkable that this volume represents an environmentally hazardous “anti-cholinergic, (or anti-metabolic, ganglion blocking) agent” for all humanity.
Discharges from certain industrial processes carry substantial amounts of gaseous fluoride. In particular, Hydrogen Fluoride when washed from the atmosphere by rain, forms a solution of Hydrofluoric Acid (0.7ppm in Mojave desert rainfall and 0.3ppm in Siberian snows) so these “anti-cholinergic” discharges, offer an additional threat by contributing to the “fluoridated hole in the Ozone Layer”.
One must assume that it is owing to the enormous economic impact of this decaying ozone on the causal industries that sources of culprit industrial discharges have not featured in the current spate of international scientific concerns nor in the records of the world’s atmospheric/climatic monitors.
Note: As an example of administratively approved industrial output, the first stage of the [Victoria’s] Portland Smelter was issued with a pollution licence to discharge into the environment, 70 tonnes per year of fluorides in gaseous and particulate forms. It is possible that this amount has been greatly exceeded because no monitoring of the discharges has thus far been executed.
Within a short twelve months after start of smelting operations, an unknown but allegedly high number of potroom workers at the smelter have acquired “potroom asthma”. A convenient euphemism for “anti-cholinergic” respiratory damage.
[*According to The Age, Melbourne University tests in 2009 showed Victoria’s Portland Smelter to be inducing crippling skeletal fluorosis in grazing animals, particularly kangaroos. Fluorosis causes “excessive bone growths, or lesions, on joints in the paws, ankles and calves. It can also cause tooth and jaw deformities”. The research found that “up to 90 per cent of the roughly 130 kangaroos living at the Portland site had some form of fluorosis on their teeth and a quarter had visible limb lumps.” Many roos were culled. The Age (21 Feb ’10) at www.theage.com.au/victoria/roos-victims-of-factory-fluoride-20100220-oms2.html ]
Fluoridated Income Generation
In an effort to increase the bio-availability of the remedial ingredient or ingredients many pharmaceutical products are halogenated. There are still many chlorinated and a few brominated products designed as nostrums for human disease states. Of recent years the catalogue of FLUORINATED PHARMACEUTICALS has doubled and redoubled until any representative listing would be beyond the scope of this paper. The proclaimed intention of the pharmacist, in fluorinating a product is to enhance still further its metabolic activity and therefore its alleged remedial qualities. For example:
“FLUDROCORTISONE ACETATE has glucocorticoid actions about 15 times as potent as hydrocortisone (unfluorinated) and mineralocorticoid effects more than a 100 times as potent.”
But, in potentiating the remedial effect, the undesirable side effects are also worsened and the ‘therapeutic’ industry gets an income from two sources. From treating the original disease condition and subsequently, from repairing the iatrogenic effects of the initial drug treatment:
Literature Quote: “Muscular weakness is an occasional side effect of most corticosteroids (hormones), most evident with:
1. FLUDROCORTISONE, and
(Both are fluorinated hormones) “It has been suggested that this effect is more pronounced when a fluorine atom is present in the 9th position.”
A useful example here is FLUORINATED TOOTHPASTE which has the long term effect, not of improving dental health but by chronic anti-metabolic processes, of severely destroying it.
[* According to board-certified neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock MD, “Fluoride is a powerful toxin for all cells and has been shown to destroy the enamel of the teeth as well. It is also a danger to the bones of the jaw, since it accumulates in those bones and destroys the bone-supporting cells, the osteoblasts. Studies commissioned by [the US] Congress clearly demonstrated that such oral fluoride treatments significantly increase oral cancers… As far as brushing, I would recommend using a non-fluoride containing toothpaste or even plain [filtered] water.” (Blaylock Wellness Report, Aug 2008, p.10)]
Thus every Australian city with or without fluoridated water supplies has as much as doubled the number of registered dentists since the advent of
FLUORINATED TOOTHPASTE, FLUORINATED GELS and FLUORINATED RINSES.
Or take the more extreme example of little Jason Burton, who had NON- PRESCRIPTION FLUORINATED DENTAL DECAY PREVENTION TABLETS (Sodium Fluoride) provided for him by loving parents who were in total ignorance of their FLUORIDE TOXIC HAZARD. Jason ingested a lethal dose of these tablets and died. We only know about Jason because the doctor recognised accurately and conscientiously the cause of his death. The existence of the death certificate, reproduced herein [*p32], has actually been denied by pro-fluoride Australian ‘scientists’ in reply to queries from overseas scientists.
It should be clear from the foregoing and what follows that human disease conditions, ranging from “POT-ROOM ASTHMA” through the various perilous stages of “ANTI-CHOLINERGIC” response, to expiration, can be accidentally OR DELIBERATELY induced by an interminable list of FLUORIDE POLLUTION and FLUORIDE COMPOUNDS which include a FLUORINATED ENVIRONMENT, FLUORIDATED ATMOSPHERE AND A FLUORINATED DRINKING WATER SUPPLY.
It may be difficult for the ‘man in the street’ to believe that a substance with so many industrial, commercial and medical ‘applications’ could be derived from or structured around a scientifically recognised toxic waste product. (See reproduction of US EPA letter). This thesis should illustrate that the chemical, pharmaceutical, commercial and political worlds are WELL AWARE OF THE DEADLY POTENTIAL OF THIS HALOGEN AND INTEND TO EXPLOIT THAT POTENTIAL TO EVERLASTING HUMAN DETRIMENT.
[*Anti-depressant medications known as SSRIs (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors) such as Prozac have been implicated in a higher risk of suicide, as indicated by the US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in 2004. These SSRIs have also been linked with violence and led to tragic deaths of spouses, family members, friends and strangers in planned mass shootings.
Prozac (fluoxetine hydrochloride, C17H18F3NO) was used from 1987 until its patent expired in 2001, though generic fluoxetine is still available. A quick way to get a “new” drug to market is to use an old approved drug for a new purpose. Prozac’s active ingredient, fluoxetine, was already approved: it was “a drug looking for a disease”. So drug maker Eli Lilly changed the name from Prozac to Sarafem and the colour of the pill from green to pink and began marketing it for PMDD, “pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder”. (See “Making a Killing” DVD, cchr.org)
Fluvoxamine (C15H21F3N2O2), branded as Luvox was used by Eric Harris, one of the shooters in the Columbine Massacre in 1999. The drug was withdrawn from sale but in 2007 it was rebranded as Luvox CR. (See cchr.org)
Some drugs other than anti-depressants are also fluorinated. The Blaylock Wellness Report (June 2007) explains further:
“In 2002, a number of murder/suicides occurred on the military base at Fort Bragg, N.C., which were linked to the fluorinated anti-malarial drug Lariam. The Canadian military experienced a similar rash of murder/suicides and uncontrollable aggression among its soldiers taking the drug as well.
“According to the “Physician’s Desk Reference”, used by doctors to prescribe medications, the commonly used fluorinated antibiotics Floxin, Levaquin, and Cipro can cause nightmares, psychotic reactions, paranoia, agitation, manic reactions, aggression and hostility, hallucinations, and even depersonalization, all symptoms associated with acts of homicide and suicide…
“What is unusual about the effect of fluorinated drugs is that they trigger planned violence rather than just violent outbursts. This is what we also witnessed in the mass shooting at Virginia Tech . Make sure that the medication your doctor prescribes is not a fluorinated one.” (Emphasis added)]
or Fluoridated Acquiescence, Lethargy, Apathy, Stupidity
There are two basic forms of halogenated “tranquilliser”: Major and Minor. The minor tranquillisers are halogenated with either Chlorine or Bromine. The major tranquillisers, albeit of variable potency, are those numerically listed hereunder, which are all FLUORINATED. All are “ANTI-CHOLINERGIC AGENTS” with INTENTIONAL effects on central nervous systems allied with cardiac and respiratory depression. The figure after the hyphen is the number of “proprietary” products (lower case) in each classification in addition to the base chemical (in CAPITALS).
1-3. BENPERIDOL. Anquil, Frenactil, Glianimon.
2-4. DROPERIDOL. Droleptan. Dridol. Inapsin. Inapsine. 3-1. FLUANISONE. Sedalande.
4-1. FLUBUPERONE HYDROCHLORIDE. Buronil. 5-1. FLUNITRAZEPAM. Rohypnol.
6-3. FLUOPROMAZINEH. Psyquil. Siquil. Vesprin.
7-1. FLUOESONE. Bripidan.
8-1. FLURBIPROFEN. Froben.
9-0. FLUPENTHIXOL DECANOATE.
10-3. FLUPENTHIXOL HYDROCHLORIDE. Depixol. Fluanxol. Emergil. 11-0. FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE.
12-0. FLUPHENAZINE ENANTHATE.
13-11. FLUPHENAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE. Modecate, Moditen,
Anatensol, Dapotum, Lyogen, Omca, Pacinol, Siqualone, Permitil, Prolixin, Sevinol.
NOTES: No 5 FLUNITRAZEPAM (Rohypnol) which is fluorinated valium was recently prescribed for a youth in Western Australia and was blamed for his subsequent death.
[*Rohypnol, fluorinated valium, is now referred to as the ‘date rape drug’.]
VALIUM (Diazepam) was the “tranquilliser most involved” in road accident victims, according to a study carried out by the Sydney University (Prof. Graham Starmer, ABC-TV’s “Quantum” 26-4-88). An obvious question: What aggravated effect would the increased potency of the fluorinated variety (Rohypnol) have on road fatalities?
Rohypnol and Valium are proprietary names of Roche products. Roche was a Swiss member of the IG Farben cartel and is probably more infamous for the terrible Stanley Mams family tragedy accurately immortalised in the film “A Song for Europe”.
According to the ABC-TV program “7:30 Report” (12-5-88), the Western Australian penal system routinely administered both Serapax and Rohypnol (synergistic drugs) to prisoners to “make them into little robots most of the time”. Including, it was alleged, throughout pregnancy.
14-2. FLURAZEPAM HYDROCHLORIDE. Dalmane, Dalmadorm. 15-2. FLUSPIRILINE. Redeptin, Imap.
16-2. HALOPERIDOL. Haldol, Serenace.
17-1. PENFLUORIDOL. Semap.
18-2. PIPAMPERONE. Dipiperon, Propitan.
19-18. TRIFLUOPERAZINE HYDROCHLORIDE. Amylozine Spansules,
Stelabid Elixir, Stelabid Forte Tabs, Stelazine, Eskazine, Calmazine, Chemflurazine, Clinazine, Fluazine, Novofluazine, Pentazine, Solazine, Trifluoper-Ez-Ets, Triflurin, Jatroneural, Terfluzin, Terfluzine.
21-2. TRIFLUPERIDOL HYDROCHLORIDE. Triperidol, Psicoperidol.
A total of 21 fluorinated “tranquillising” compounds plus an additional 58 brand name ‘major tranquillisers’ use fluoride as an ingredient. Undoubtedly many others have been added to this list since the reference work was published in June 1977.
[*Dr Russell Blaylock: “In 1990, about 220 fluorinated pharmaceutical drugs were on the market. Now some 1,500 are under development… (BWR June 2007)]
Florida International University (Rotton, Tikovsky and Feldman) showed that “…minute amounts (0.45ppm) of Sodium Fluoride solution …impair visual sensorimotor performance.” JAP,Vol. 67:2.” with a consequent slowing down in mental and physical reaction times (sedative or tranquillising effect). This finding is of relevance when driving or operating machinery, if for no other reason. Nevertheless, attempts over a number of years, to draw this to the attention of those authorities allegedly concerned with driver/industrial safety have been met only with silence or obstruction. [*Also see The Australian Fluoridation News, Vol 47 No 1, Jan-Mar 2011, page 8.]
Early in 1987, Swedish researchers linked tranquillisers to birth defects, nominating (in Lancet) the drug benzodiazepine (Diazepam or VALIUM) as a particular culprit. [*The Shorter Oxford (2002) notes Fluphenazine is a “tranquillizer” & Flurazepam is “a benzodiazepine widely used as a hypnotic”.]
FLUORINATED INHALATION ANAESTHETICS Fluoridated Unconsciousness
(The PEN-ultimate in mind and behaviour control)
As with “fluorinated tranquillisers” there are a number of anaesthetics halogenated with Chlorine and Bromine. The ‘popular’ modern anaesthetics are those listed here, which are all FLUORINATED. Once again all are “ANTI- CHOLINERGIC AGENTS” with intentional designed effects on central human nervous systems, accompanied by cardiac and respiratory depression.
2. ISOFLURANE. Forane.
[* CF3CHClOCHF2 “most widely used” – Rang, Dale & Ritter, Pharmacology, p 522]
3. METHOXYFLURANE. Penthrane.
[* “Now rarely used because of its renal toxicity”; Pharmacology, p 522] 24
4. ENFLURANE. Ethrane.
[* CHFClCF2OCHF2. The “main drawback… is that can cause seizures either during induction or following recovery from anaesthesia” p523]
5. HALOTHANE. Fluothane, Samothane.
[* CF3CHBrCl “widely used today” (p 522). In the year 2000, both of the following are described as “recently introduced”: DESFLURANE (CF3CHFOCHF2) and SEVOFLURANE (CF3)2CHOOH2F. Note that unlike many drugs, effective anaesthetics have a very long commercial life. Fluothane is still used after 45 years and shares the market with enflurane and isoflurane, and more recently with desflurane and sevoflurane. JS Moillet – in Banks, p370]
Note: There are scientific studies which demonstrate that the progeny of ‘anaesthetists’ have a higher rate of birth defect than does the general community. A significant statistic in the established peri-natal (SIDS) mortality/fluorine connection.
Some of the hazardous ‘side effects’ given in the medical literature for fluorinated anaesthetics are difficult to separate from those effects intended to induce a hopefully controllable unconscious state. For example, under “Toxic effects” are listed “respiratory depression”, “depressant action on the cardiovascular system”, “bradycardia and profound hypotension” (or slowing pulse and a drop in blood pressure), “Hepatic dysfunction” (or liver damage), “Halothane blocks the transmission of nerve impulses through ganglia” (or central nervous system inhibition), “Cardiac arrest” (or death) .
In other words, all of the “ANTI-CHOLINERGIC” effects variously intended, variously inherent, as are induced by the fluorinated propellants, fluorinated pharmaceuticals and/or fluorinated tranquillisers, and fluorinated exterminators.
So far these ‘data’ pages illustrate how fluorine and fluorination have been sold, packaged and/or prescribed for both public and professional credibility, on “health” grounds. The final page deals with the same halogen as it really is, really was and always will be, and as it is employed in those products listed. One of the deadliest, multi-functional and insidious poisons known to mankind.
It is significant in the context of deliberate government mind control and physical chemical intervention, to note that in Australia the hazardous fluorinated anti-metabolic agents and anti-cholinergic agents enjoy Federal and State Government APPROVAL AND SUBSIDISED DISTRIBUTION, whilst the safe, nutritional substances, vitally necessary to combat and repair
systemic chronic toxic injury wrought by the “free drugs” are available only at considerable cost to the victim. Furthermore the same bureaucracy that approved the ‘killers’ has sought to restrict public access to the remedial supplements. Some local Councils even infringe the laws of medical prescription and issue free Sodium Fluoride tablets for dosing of children without any warning, much less any advice on antidotes.
And those same Government instrumentalities and Ministerial ‘heads’ that oppose the ready availability of nutritional supplements are the same Ministers and public servants who lie, cheat, defraud, defame, blackmail and coerce to increase the distribution or compel the ingestion of fluorides and fluoride bearing products. The same as those who, in defiance of the Australian Constitution (Section 51, xxiiiA) legislated to have the chemical dumped into our drinking water supplies.
To sum up the above: The killer drugs are approved, encouraged or enforced and SUBSIDISED while the vital, remedial nutrients and metabolites (rendered necessary by the ‘free’ hazardous drugs) are NOT SUBSIDISED, BUT AVAILABILITY IS OFFICIALLY DISCOURAGED AND OBSTRUCTED.
FLUORINATED EXTERMINATORS Fluoridated Death
(The ULTIMATE in mind and behaviour control)
As with “tranquillisers” and “anaesthetics”, chemical warfare gases are sometimes halogenated. Riot control gases, tear gas (or lacrimators) employ either Bromine (brominated) or Chlorine (chlorinated e.g. “MACE”, and Tabun discovered accidentally in 1936) as halogenators. But the lethal German IG Farben developed nerve gases “Soman” and “Sarin” are both FLUORINATED and replaced “Tabun” for speed and efficacy in killing the enemy, by their immediate ANTI-CHOLINERGIC AGENCY.
1. “SARIN”. Isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate. [*Created in 1938. [(CH3)2CHO]CH3P(O)F. The name Sarin was derived from the Farben scientists involved in its development: Schrader, Ambros, Rudiger and van der Linde.
Tokyo correspondent Ben Hills wrote about sarin for The Age (20 Aug 1994): “The gas has been used to deadly effect on several occasions that we know of… In June 1994, sarin from a still undiscovered source wafted through windows in two apartment buildings in the Japanese resort town of Matsumoto, killing eight people and affecting hundreds more.” He adds that sarin is “20 times as
deadly as potassium cyanide, a droplet the size of pinprick on the skin can kill.” The June 1995 sarin attack on commuters in Tokyo’s underground killed 13, injured thousands, and caused panic throughout Tokyo. Saddam Hussein used sarin against the Kurds in Northern Iraq in 1988. See “Fluoride Fume Deaths” in The Australian Fluoridation News, Apr-Jun 2012, pp 1-3.]
2. “SOMAN”. Pinacolyl methylphosphonofluoridate. [*Created in 1944] The almost immediate death caused by exposure to nerve gases, is a result of instantaneous ‘blocking’ of catalysis and nerve action by the fluorinated gas, by ACUTE ANTI-CHOLINERGIC AGENCY (enzymatic “blocking”) and consequent cessation of heart and lung function.
[*The British scientists working after the war at the Chemical Defence Experimental Station, Porton Down (Wiltshire, UK) on these compounds dubbed them the “German Agents” or “G Agents”. Tabun was referred to as GA, Sarin as GB, Soman as GD and cyclosarin as GF. Banks, p 515-7]
Included here are two medical fluorinated compounds called:
3. “DYFLOS”. (Di-isopropyl Fluorophosphate) designed to treat, inter alia, the eye disease of glaucoma. It is described in the literature as an “irreversible cholinesterase inhibitor (ANTI-CHOLINERGIC) and the toxic effects may be prolonged. Systemic toxicity occurs after inhalation of the vapour.”
[* “Dyflos and parathion are… rapidly absorbed through mucous membranes and even through unbroken skin and insect cuticles; the use of these agents as war gases or insecticides relies on this property.” Rang, Dale & Ritter, p 134]
4.”FLUOROURACIL” Uracil is an essential human metabolite. It is fluorinated in a “last resort” attempt to control the growth of, and/or destroy cancer cells through enzyme (DNA and RNA) “blocking” activity. The toxic effects are severe and sometimes fatal.” It is often paradoxical in action and actually provokes cancer. ‘Side effects’, all severe and numerous are those associated with other fluorinated ANTI-CHOLINERGIC AGENTS set out previously. The physiological consequences attending this deliberate fluorination of a human metabolite illustrates the deadly peril of any fluorination process but in particular, the fluorination of a vital metabolite, (rendering it ANTI-metabolic in action) human electrolyte or essential nutrient such as WATER.
5. FLUOROACETAMIDE (1081). Another instance of an vital metabolite, ‘acetamide’ being converted (halogenated) to a potent anti-metabolite by fluorination. (In Britain this product, a close chemical cousin to the stuff used
to fluorinate water supplies and toothpaste etc, “is restricted to the extermination of rats in ships and sewers”).
[* In the mid 1940s, an entomologist conducting “experiments on the effectiveness of ethyl fluoroacetate as a fumigant put a little in a petri dish, and when it had evaporated, it was found that every insect in the huge greenhouse had been killed.” It took one dead worker and several dead rabbits before work stopped on 1081 as insecticide. Like Tabun, this was one more example of scientists stumbling upon extremely potent toxins whilst on the hunt for insecticides. 1081 was known already to be so powerful that it was removed from the realm of insecticides – the Allies in WWII were aware already of its potential elsewhere. See Banks, p217]
HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID. (Fluorosilicic Acid, Hydrofluoric Acid) These are toxic ‘waste products’ of the fertiliser industry and are all used for FLUORIDATION OF DRINKING WATER.Warning (quoted from medical literature): “INHALATION HAZARD. Inhalation of Hydrofluorosilicic Acid from soaked cotton clothing could cause irreversible lung damage in ONE MINUTE” due to ANTI- CHOLINERGIC ACTIVITY”.
SODIUM FLUORIDE. FLUORIDATION OF DRINKING WATER. A ‘waste product’ of the Aluminium Industry. This hazardous INTRACTABLE GARBAGE has become, by dint of promotion and sly public re-education, the active ingredient in fluorinated pesticides, fungicides, nematocides, rodenticides, anaesthetics, tranquillisers, fluorinated medications (pharma- ceuticals), a number of industrial and domestic products, fluorinated dental gels, rinses and toothpastes.In other words, so much a part of multi-billion dollar industrial and pharmaceutical income that any withdrawal, FOR ANY REASON, by the promoters, the fluoridationists or by anyone who has supported them for whatever purpose, is IMPOSSIBLE on a financial basis, embarrassing on a reputation basis and unthinkable on a LEGAL basis.
SODIUM FLUOROACETATE (COMPOUND 1080). As 5 above. This seems to be the preferred “exterminator” for rodents, [*foxes] etc, on the proclaimed grounds that it is slightly less hazardous for humans. Death by 1080 will take a little longer and be slightly less painful than death by 1081. It will, however, be no less permanent.
SODIUM SILICOFLUORIDE. FLUORIDATION OF DRINKING WATER. A waste product of the Fertiliser Industry. It must be removed, by
International Law, from fertiliser so that pastures, crops, sheep and cattle will not be harmed. That it is then sold for disposal through the community kidneys is NOT a matter of international concern. Until this more profitable use was found, it was used almost exclusively as an insecticide and rodenticide. An EXTERMINATOR.
While this thesis is directed at the ‘grass roots’ where people are most likely to be affected (as a result of being screened from the truth) there will be some who, retaining the foolish but implanted ‘reference complex’ will need to verify the content. This will be a simple matter from their own or public library sources without biased prompting by the author.
That said, the author acknowledges the considerable value of the following, for evidential support of this thesis:
• “Martindale.TheExtraPharmacopoeia”,Editions25and27. • “EncyclopaediaBritannica”,EditionNo15.
• “World Without Cancer”, by G Edward Griffin. [*See www.realityzone.com] • “TheCrimeandPunishmentofIGFarben”,byJosephBorkin.
• Certain unrefuted, unchallenged correspondence, allegations and scientific
papers by the author.
[* ADDITIONAL REFERENCES]
Varney, Wendy, “Fluoride in Australia: A Case to Answer”, 1986, Hale & Ironmonger, p72
Rang HP, Dale MM, Ritter JM, “Pharmacology”, 1999, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK
Banks, RE ed, “Fluorine Chemistry at the Millennium: Fascinated by Fluorine”, 2000, Elsevier Science Ltd, UK
The Australian Fluoridation News, published since 1963. fluoridationnews.com
Walker, GSR, “Fluoridation: Poison on Tap”, 1982, Magenta Press, Melbourne
Moolenburgh, Dr Hans, “Fluoride: The Freedom Fight”, 1987, Mainstream Pub. Co.
Sutton, Dr Phillip R.N., “The Greatest Fraud: Fluoridation”, 1996, Kurunda, Aust.
Blaylock, Dr Russell, “Blaylock Wellness Report” (BWR), www.newsmax.com
Bryson, Christopher, “The Fluoride Deception”, 2004, Seven Stories Press, NY 29
Since it was the Parliamentary activities of Harley Rivers Dickinson, Member for South Barwon (Victoria) that prompted the research that led to the writing of this thesis, it is fitting that the epilogue should refer to more representational work on the same subject, (fluoridation of water supplies) by the same member in the same Parliament.
In February of the year 1983 Harley Dickinson placed two ‘questions on notice’ to the then Minister for Health, T Roper, on behalf of his Geelong district constituents. The first question was in 10 parts and the second in eight parts affording some excuse for a delay in preparing comprehensive answers.
In any case the people would not wish questions on matters vital to their health, to be answered without due consideration.
The questions were answered and recorded in Hansard of April 7th, 1988, on behalf of the now displaced T Roper, by the [then] Minister for Health, D White, MORE THAN FIVE YEARS AFTER THE ASKING.
A period of waiting, intolerable in a health matter even were the questions answered in a generally responsible fashion, which they certainly were not.
Without going into the detail of the questions and answers, having pointed out the extreme and perilous lassitude of the Victorian State Government, suffice to remark that the answers varied from patent falsehoods to inadvertent exposure of Ministerial fraud. From the repeated quoting of proven fraudulent ‘evidence’ to accurate but selected part quotations of literature evidence. From admissions of impropriety by the Victorian bureaucracy to baseless assertions, there were no bounds to the underhandedness and deceit.
This story is full of overlapping, interwoven, interlocking circumstances beyond the statistical or reasonable bounds of chance or coincidence. Pursuing each facet, each tortuous avenue from The Dickinson Statement as a starting point, will confound and dumbfound the ‘pursuer’ with still more “mind boggling” information.
The histories of Cecil Rhodes, the Rhodes Scholarships and its recipients, The Fabian Society, The Bilderbergers, The Federal Reserve, The Illuminati, International Banking, The House of Rothschild, General Analine and Film, are just a few of the ‘avenues’ to be explored, your research into these histories will make your hair stand on end.
“Obscurum per obscurius” (L) (Explaining) the obscure by means of the more obscure. 30
An Australian Death Certificate: [*Also see p 21, main text]
ORIGINAL BACK COVER (1987)
This thesis has been produced in this more convenient form because of the unprecedented demand for the original, more bulky paper. Although there is some ‘updating’ and some expansion of the earlier text, the concept and the data remain unaltered.
A sincere “thank you” is tendered to those people of perception and dedication who, having studied the original document, expressed their appreciation and concern.
However, despite the self-evident truth within these few pages, there will be those who will still not be able to accept the “mind-boggling” facts. To these the author pleads, in the name of humanity, for additional research and deeper contemplation.
There will be those too, who for diverse reasons, including the devilish motives set out herein, and in total absence of any scientific or logical refutation of “The Dickinson Statement” will attempt to denigrate the author and his work.
To the many individuals and organisations who, screened from criticism and punitive action by their social honours, academic graffiti, by our strange defamation laws and secured from blame by the passage of time, advocate the unrestricted feeding of rat and rabbit poison to infants goes this message:
‘May the Lord have mercy on your souls because you deserve no mercy, only contempt from your fellow man!’
Appendix 1: Science and Medicine*
Medical and dental associations in a few countries would like us to believe that everyone in the “scientific or medical world” unanimously supports fluoridation. But those in the medical world without vested interests, who critically and scientifically examine fluoridation, find it cannot be endorsed with any level of integrity. The number of aware scientists and medical professionals is increasing.
Two concurring views of fluorides as powerful ageing factors
The best known is Dr John Yiamouyiannis, whose book, “Fluoride: The Aging Factor” caused a furore. This book was described by the late Glen Walker as “the best book on the physiological/anatomical effects of fluorides on human
health ever written.”
A suitable illustration (left) accompanied the book review of “Fluoride: The Aging Factor”, originally published in National Fluoridation News in 1983.
The second view is that of Forrest J Pinkerton MD (1892 – 1974), an American VIP doctor with personal citations from four presidents (Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Johnson and Nixon). He was a 33rd degree Freemason and
founded Hawaii’s Blood Bank, the first in the United States, before the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbour. He accomplished much in his life, was very active in his community and had a stellar medical career. He’d observed fluoridation’s effects and had the integrity not to endorse it. The year before he died, Dr Pinkerton sent a letter to the then Editor of The Australian Fluoridation News, which is reproduced on the following page.
FORREST J. PINKERTON, M.D., F.A.C.S. ARCADIA
1434 PUNAHOU STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96822
Mr. R. Fulton,
70 Thorne St., Toronto
New South Wales, Australia 2283
Dear Mr. Fulton,
May 30, 1973
In reply to your recent letter re mass fluoridation of pure potable drinking water, I must regretfully advise you that I have ceased to engage in case reports or further studies on fluoridation.
I have studied the pros and cons of fluoridation for 25 or more years and must honestly advise you that in my opinion from sincere truthful observation and countless case by case experiences, I have concluded that fluoridation does not prevent dental caries at any age of humanity.
Basically, at the very beginning, fluoridation was proposed as a commercial method of getting rid of accumulating masses of one of the most potent poisons known. Its use for mass prevention of dental caries was promoted for financial gain purposes by those who were heavily involved in promoting the sale of a dangerous waste product for profit.
Fluoridation, from the very beginning has now been proven by every means of scientific proof to be useless in dental decay and instead causes countless diseases in humans, (cardiac, kidney and respiratory) to shorten lives.
There are so many (uncountable) case reports, that we have ceased reporting them even though they are very spectacular.
I regret that I cannot be of more assistance. I also regret that the national and international greed for money via the false claims of fluoridationists will ever be a colossal blot on the accuracy and intelligence of Man.
Appendix 2: “SIDS” Press Release (1984)*
Environmental Health Hazard Research (EHHR) Mitcham (Vic), Australia.
NEWS RELEASE 18th May 1984 NEW EVIDENCE
On May the 15 , the Premier of Victoria, the Honourable John Cain, expressed
his “deep concern” about “alarmist statements” being made in the context of Victorian public health (Channel 10, 6pm news, 15th May, 1984).
What follows are some additional “alarmist statements” in the same health context, which should serve to deepen his “concern” and also the ‘concern’ of the entire community, when properly related, one to the other.
The Sydney Sun-Herald of February 5, 1984, on behalf of radio station 2GB, asked the full page question: “Has the dental wonder of the fifties become the genetic blunder of the eighties?” In a week-long series of program segments, 2GB’s NEWSFRONT team answered in the frightening affirmative, with prestigious scientific support.
On the second day of June 1981, the Victorian State Environment Protection Policy was revised to provide air quality control objectives, which included the “two major industrial pollutants”, the first Fluorine, a highly poisonous pollutant equal to, if not worse than Sulphur Dioxide.
On the worst days of pollution this city has yet experienced, April 6, 1984, and subsequently, the relevant EPA computer printout reveals that only two of the twelve monitoring stations were recording Sulphur Dioxide levels and NONE AT ALL were recording Fluorine levels during this critical period, despite the plethora of recognised sources of this toxin in our city.
(A deliberate ‘oversight’ as a political favour to industry at incalculable public health expense?)
Furthermore the data published QUARTERLY BY THE EPAV (EPA Vic.) never mentions fluorine pollution levels, even in districts where those levels are known to be way beyond international limits, such as Geelong, with a ‘fertiliser plant at one end of town and an aluminium smelter at the other end’.
Six official scientific studies executed in the United Kingdom in the mid- seventies, showed that up to 52% of the 15 year old children examined were
victims of the serious disease known as environmental fluorosis, or more simply chronic fluoride poisoning.
A similar study published in the British Dental Journal (April 7, 1984) of TEN year old children showed that SIX OUT OF EVERY TEN examined, suffered from this chronic bone altering, environmental disease.
Melbourne, as witness the recent ‘smog’ episodes, is fast approaching a hazardous environment comparable to 1) Cubatao (Brazil) “where babies are born without brains”, 2) Hobart, which holds the “world record for cot deaths”, and 3) the industrial north of England where the daily papers are now carrying such headlines as:
“70% increase in stillbirths”
“The North tops the death list”
“Hunt for (infant) kidney disease clues”
“Cot death tragedy of twin (Bacup, Lancs.) girls”
“Cot death verdict on (Rhyll) twins”.[* When fluoridation is commenced, there is a higher incidence of premature births, stillbirths and death rates in new born children, and also in goats, dogs, guinea pigs, partridge chicks, chinchillas, trout, poultry and chickens. See “High Incidence of Premature and Stillbirths” in The Australian Fluoridation News, Oct- Dec 2011, pp. 1-7]Fluorine is both mutagenic and teratogenic, which means that the diseased youngsters examined in the mid-seventies studies referred to earlier, will, as they become of marriageable age, produce children that have a higher likelihood of being damaged by their parents’ exposure to fluorine compounds.Britain’s Royal Commission into Environmental Pollution (The Sciences, Feb. 1984) said: “Industry will do nothing about it unless compelled by law.”We DO have the pollution. We DO have the consequences. We DO have the “law” controlling pollution. Why then, is the “law” not implemented?“The body receives fluoride ions which are identical no matter from what source” (Hobart Mercury – for the Australian Nutrition Foundation, May 3, 1984).“Fluoride ions are exactly the same no matter what the original compound” (recorded phone message from the Tasmanian Department of Child Health, May 9, 1984).Potassium fluoride and methylphosphonol difluoride are the main ingredients of nerve gas. A tiny amount of nerve gas can kill by chemical suppression of
the autonomic nervous system. (Melbourne Sun, April 2, 1984; the Merck Index & Encyclopedia Brittanica).
Cot death may be the result of chemical suppression of the autonomic nervous system, according to Dr. David Read of Sydney University (The Age, April 4, 1984).
An extensive document was submitted to the EPAV (at its written request) on Nov 24, 1982, which postulated chemical nerve suppression of the autonomic nervous system as the “link between perinatal mortality and environmental fluorine”. While THAT evidence remains unrefuted (actually strengthened substantially) in the interim, there has been NO remedial action by the Authority or by the Government.
SUMMARY… Fluoride ions are incorporated in NERVE GASES, rodenticides, pesticides, insecticides, nematocides, herbicides, fungicides, etc, SOLELY for their capacity to kill living entities in VERY TINY AMOUNTS and we now have it on official authority that those fluoride ions are “IDENTICAL” or “EXACTLY THE SAME” AS THE FLUORIDE IONS WHICH OUR GOVERNMENT ADDS TO OUR WATER SUPPLIES… “IDENTICAL” or “EXACTLY THE SAME” AS THE FLUORIDE IONS THAT THE GOVERNMENT ALLOWS TO BE INCLUDED IN DENTAL PRODUCTS SUCH AS TOOTHPASTE… “IDENTICAL” or “EXACTLY THE SAME” AS THE FLUORIDE IONS WHICH (UNMONITORED) PERVADE OUR ATMOSPHERE.
On April 6, 1984, the Irish Press (Dublin) published the following, which although not ‘new evidence’ per se, reveals a public awareness of the ‘new evidence’, and its profound health and legal implications (there are presently US$480,000,000.00 in claims listed in US Courts for fluorine induced ‘damages’):
ABSTRACT… “so convincing is the evidence implicating fluorides that parents of mongol children as well as parents of ‘cot death’ victims should consider seeking legal advice for the purpose of taking action for damages against our (Ireland’s) dilatory Minister of Health”.
Ian E. Stephens, International Director, EHHR
Appendix 3: “Fluorine” (1988)*
The complexities of halogen chemistry are legion and it is that very complexity that is employed by the less scrupulous fluorine advocates to stifle protest from their adversaries with pseudo-scientific, convoluted terminology which, very often they themselves do not understand. Very much a matter of ‘the blind leading the blind’.
Fluorine is an element. Atomic number 9. Atomic weight 18.9984. Symbol F.
Fluorine is a halogen. There are five halogens known to contemporary science. In alphabetical order these are Astatine, Bromine, Chlorine, FLUORINE and Iodine.
Fluorine is one of the most poisonous substances known to the science of toxicology.
The word ‘halogen’ is derived from the Greek (hals meaning salt and genes meaning born). The word refers to the property of the element to combine with Sodium. Examples are: Sodium Bromide, Sodium Chloride, Sodium Fluoride etc.
This ‘mixture’ of a halogen and one or more other substances is called a “halide”, the letters “IDE” being affixed to the first letters of the particular halogen title. Thus Bromine compounded with something else, becomes a Bromide. A Chlorine compound likewise becomes a Chloride and a Fluorine compound becomes a Fluoride.
The other ingredient/s of the halide are included in the title to completely identify the halide chemically. So Sodium mixed with Chlorine becomes Sodium Chloride. Potassium mixed with Bromine becomes Potassium Bromide and Calcium mixed with Fluorine becomes Calcium Fluoride and so on for literally thousands of simple and complex combinations.
For all practical purposes the element FLUORINE cannot exist as a single entity. It must always associate with another substance or substances to exist. That is to say it is only found as a FLUORIDE.
In this need for existence, Fluorine, more so than the other halogen elements, will combine avidly with almost any other substance or substances, taking its deadly potential along with it to impart a lethal hazard to what was formerly a most innocent and benign material. The resultant degree of toxicity is not in debate here.
A well recognised example of this ‘chemical corruption’ is in the medicinal drug “Fluorouracil” whereby the vital and totally inoffensive human metabolite “uracil” is converted into a deadly ‘cytotoxic’ (cell destructive) killer compound.
So then simple (duplex) Fluorine based compounds can combine or be combined with one or more other virtually harmless substances to create a chemical killer of considerable complexity and extreme danger.
A ‘triplex’ Fluoride is Sodium Fluoroacetate, marketed under the cover name of Compound 1080. Another is Fluoroacetamide (Compound 1081).
The designed deadliness of both of these FLUORIDE products is legend and promoted under the 1080 and 1081 labels but the close chemical relationship with the Sodium Fluoride in your water supply is vehemently denied. Much less admitted.
Other examples of multiple fluorides are “SARIN” (Isopropyl methyl- phosphoFLUORIDATE) and “SOMAN” (Pinacolyl methylphosphono- FLUORIDATE).
Both these ‘fluorides’ are nerve gases, one drop of either of which, absorbed through the skin, will kill an adult human, in seconds.
In Martindale Extra Pharmacopoeia, under the heading Sodium Fluoride is the sub-heading “and other Fluorine Compounds” which include both 1080 and 1081.
Other data and relevant physiologic aspects of Fluorides have been set out in “The Dickinson Statement”.
In closing this paper it should be pointed out that Fluorides are toxic to animals in a number of chemical and bio-chemical ways. CORROSIVE. ANTI- METABOLIC. ALLERGENIC. GENETIC. CARCINOGENIC. SYSTEMIC. ENZYME INHIBITING and CUMULATIVE are among the popular descriptions of the toxic activity of fluorides. As an “acute” poison, a comparatively large dose may be needed to cause extinction but as a “chronic” toxin neither the microscopic amounts needed nor the period of exposure (to cause death) have ever been evaluated. However, as an awesome indication, time lapse photography of the activity of living mammalian cells under the influence of ONE PART OF SODIUM FLUORIDE TO 60 MILLION PARTS OF WATER demonstrates almost immediate extinction of the cells. (Fluoridated tap water contains an “average” of TWO PARTS OF SODIUM FLUORIDE TO ONE MILLION PARTS OF WATER.
Suffice now to say:- In the final analysis all FLUORIDES are killers and who-so-ever administers, or causes to be administered any Fluoride on any pretext, by accident or by design to any person of any age is, by simple definition a KILLER.
– Ian E. Stephens, Melbourne, 8th June, 1988
Appendix 4: Selected Quotations*
Dr John Colquhoun, who was responsible for fluoridation in New Zealand: “I now realize that what my colleagues and I were doing was what the history of science shows all professionals do when their pet theory is confronted by disconcerting new evidence: they bend over backwards to explain away the new evidence. They try very hard to keep their theory intact – especially so, if their own professional reputations depend on maintaining that theory.” Horrified by his continued research on fluoridation he courageously opposed fluoride, and like many other dentists who speak out around the world, he was ‘retired early’. (See www.fluoridation.com/colquhoun.htm)
Dr John Yiamouyiannis, author of “Fluoride: The Aging Factor”: “Our studies show that cancers of the gastro-intestinal tract, kidney, bladder, breast and ovaries are those primarily associated with fluoride intake.” (“Cancer Control Journal”, Vol 5, No’s 1+2, p75)
Dr Dean Burk (Chief Chemist Emeritus, US National Cancer Institute): “Fluoride causes more human cancer death, and causes it faster, than any other chemical.”
From “Scientific American” (Mar 1959), “The First Heartbeats” by James D. Ebert: “In low concentrations it [sodium fluoride] primarily affects the heart, but at high concentrations it causes the embryo to disintegrate according to a clear-cut pattern starting in the heart-forming regions. At any given stage of development, from the appearance of primitive streak through the establishment of the heart, the locations of the cells destroyed by sodium fluoride coincide with the sites that have the greatest capacity to form heart muscle…”
Dr Hans Moolenburgh: “Precisely at the moment the state makes you swallow a medicine without asking your permission and without the possibility of an alternative, democracy has ceased to be and you live in a totalitarian state.” (“Fluoride: The Freedom Fight”)
Dr FB Exner: US physician who dedicated years of his life to studying fluoridation: “Fluoridation is totalitarian medicine, in that it is compulsory and all things are done to your body whether you like it or not. Its only purpose (except for the secondary ones of providing jobs and empire) is to serve as precedent for compulsory medication. It is designed to put over the greatest hoax in history, and to destroy once and for all the constitutional protection of the citizen.” (“Fluoridation: Poison On Tap”, p67)
Glen Walker, author of “Fluoridation: Poison on Tap”, addressing the public in Colac, Victoria, in late 1989: “That’s the greatest thing in Australia – People Power. If only each person could understand the voice they have and the power of that voice… the history of this country has been written on People Power. Think back on all the things you can remember, and the greatest thing that comes to mind is the Vietnam War. It wasn’t the governments of Victoria or Australia that stopped us being involved – it was People Power!”
Mahatma Gandhi: “The function of a civil resister is to provoke response. And we will continue to provoke until they respond. They are not in control. We are.”
The Dickinson Statement brings clarity to fluoridation and fluorides.
Ian Edward Stephens, a trained mechanical engineer, was a deeply passionate man concerned with issues of health. Here he illuminates some hidden history and intrigue surrounding fluoride, an important industrial chemical. Originally self-published in 1987, his booklet has been available on the Internet since the mid 1990s and has altered many people’s perceptions and lives.
The second half reveals the deadly nature of the fluoride compounds that have afflicted many deeply without them ever suspecting the cause of their troubles. While the subject itself is technical in nature, Ian has made the ideas accessible to all with his forthright and engaging writing style. He adds a dash of humour when it’s least expected.
By airing fluoride’s ‘dirty laundry’, Ian forewarns readers about passively accepting any fluoride chemicals or compounds as “safe and effective”. It’s only when we discover this crucial information, rarely seen in the mass media, that we can make fully informed choices on the subject. The adage “information is power” has never been more true.
This 25th anniversary expanded edition may well improve the quality of your health and life, giving you the facts and allowing you, the reader, and indeed all of us to get on with protecting ourselves and the ones we love from unnecessary harm. To the late Ian E Stephens, we are forever grateful.
Australian Anti-Fluoridation Association (AAFA) GPO Box 935
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!