Available online at www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com

page1image2198404784

 page1image2198351840 page1image2198420848

Pelagia Research Library Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55

Fluoride concentration in ground water of Kalahandi and Nuapada District, Odisha, India

1* 2 3 4 Nilalakanth Dash , Smruti Prabha Das , Tanushree Patnaik , Simpi Bhaban Patel

4 and R. K. Dey

1Dept. of Chemistry, Panchayat College, Dharmagarh, Odisha, India 2Dept. of Chemistry, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, India
3Dept. of Chemistry Stewart Science College, Cuttack, Odisha, India 4Centre for Applied Chemistry, Central University of Jharkhand, Jharkhand, India

__________________________________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT

The present study deals with ground water quality with respect to the fluoride content in water resources of Kalahandi and Nuapada districts of Odisha, India. Water samples were collected in different locations covering tap water, open wells, tube wells and river waters. Ground waters of tube wells are highly polluted with fluoride in comparison to open wells. In Nuapada district out of 4920 tube wells 399 contains 1.5-3.0 (mg/L) and 114 are from 3-5(mg/L) and 22 are from 5-6.5> (mg/L). A survey report shows 22557 people are affected with fluorosis and nearly 2 lakh people are in risk. In Kalahandi district Karalkot, Kerijhola and Binapur water supply contains objectionable fluoride content i.e. 3.88 mg/L. Dental fluorosis was observed among school children in Boden and Sonapalli blocks. In view of the severity of the problem the defluoridation techniques need to be evolved to reduce or minimize the fluoride concentration in drinking water.

Keywords: Ground water, Fluoride, Kalahandi, Nuapada, Odisha

__________________________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION

The crucial role groundwater plays as a decentralized source of drinking water for millions rural and urban families cannot be overstated. According to some estimates, it accounts for nearly 80 per cent of the rural domestic water needs, and 50 per cent of the urban water needs in India.

Groundwater is generally less susceptible to contamination and pollution when compared to surface water bodies. Also, the natural impurities in rainwater, which replenishes groundwater systems, get removed while infiltrating through soil strata. But, In India, where groundwater is used intensively for irrigation and industrial purposes, a variety of land and water-based human activities are causing pollution of this precious resource. Its over-exploitation is causing aquifer contamination in certain instances, while in certain others its unscientific development with insufficient knowledge of groundwater flow dynamic and geo-hydrochemical processes has led to its mineralization[1,2]. Fluoride content in groundwater is mainly due to natural contamination, but the process of dissolution is still not well understood[3,4]. Fluoride, an electronegative element, is highly reactive, therefore, almost never occurs in elemental state in natural water. It combines with most of the elements to form ionic or

___________________________________________________________________________

covalent fluorides. Areas with semi-arid climate, crystalline igneous rocks and alkaline soils are mostly affected[3]. The origin of fluoride in groundwater is through weathering of alkali, igneous and sedimentary rocks. The common fluoride bearing minerals are Fluorspar (CaF2), Cryolite (Na3AlF6), Fluor-apatite (Ca3 (PO4)2 Ca (FCl2). Fluorite (CaF2) is the principle bearer of fluoride and is found in granite, granite gneisses and pegmatite[5,6]. Apart from natural sources, a considerable amount of fluoride may be contributed due to anthropogenic activities. Burning of coal, manufacturing process of aluminium, steel, bricks, Phosphatic fertilizers industries, often contain fluoride as an impurity and are being leached down to the ground water[5,7,8,9]. The high level of fluoride in drinking water beyond the permissible limit[2] has toxic effects, while its optimum level shows beneficial effects in reducing dental carries. The severity depends upon the amount ingested and the duration of intake[10].

Fig-1: Kalahandi and Nuapada Districts of Odisha

Fluoride contamination of groundwater is a growing problem in many parts of the world. High concentration of fluoride is reported both from hard rock (granites & gneisses) as well as alluvial aquifers[11]. In India more than 66million people are at risk of developing fluorosis and high fluoride concentration in groundwater (greater than 1 mg/l) is widespread in the arid to semi-arid western states of Rajasthan and Gujarat and in the southern states of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu[12,13,14,15]. People living in such areas were drinking high fluoride water without realizing its presence, which caused various bone diseases. The cause of high fluoride in ground water is geogenic being a result of the dissolution of fluoride bearing minerals. Fluoride in ground water is mainly influenced by the local and regional geological setting and hydro geological condition. However, soil consisting of clay minerals[16,17], the influence of local lithology, aided by other factors like semi-arid climate of the region may be responsible for higher concentration of fluoride in the groundwater of the region. In sea area, fluoride containing chemical components of Ca, Mg, Na, Cl, SO4, bicarbonate, Bromide, Phosphate, Iron, Aluminium etc., Locally used agricultural pesticides and anthropogenic contamination of surface water due to many rivers carry on particulate

47

page2image2162887888page2image2162888192page2image2162888496page2image2162888800page2image2162889168page2image2162889472page2image2162889776page2image2162890080page2image2162890512page2image2162890816page2image2162891120

Pelagia Research Library

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

matter on rainy seasons. Fluoride problems are wide spread in nine states of India covering almost the entire country. Nearly 66million of people face the risk of which an estimated 6million are children. In view to look into the aspects of water quality and related health problems, the water quality date of Kalahandi and Nuapada districts of Odisha, India, are highly fluoride effected villages has been studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Study area

The study was undertaken in Kalahandi and Nuapada districts of Odisha. Initially, Nuapada District was a part of Kalahandi District till early March 1993, but for the administrative convenience, Kalahandi District was divided into two parts – Kalahandi and Nuapada under the state government Notification on 27th March, 1993.

The district of Kalahandi is located in south-west region of the state of Orissa. As regards geographical region, the

oooo
district is situated between 19 3’N and 20 18’N latitude and 82 20’E and 83 47’E longitudes. The district

headquarter town Bhawanipatna is situated at a distance of 418 kms from State Capital Bhubaneswar. The district is bounded on the north by Nuapada and Balangir districts, on the east by Kandhamal and Rayagada, on the south by Nabarangapur and Koraput districts, on the west by Raipur (Chhatisgarh) and Nabarangapur districts. Total geographical area of this district as supplied by the Surveyor General of India is 7,920 sq kms. The district ranked seven in this state of Orissa in comparison to other districts in terms of area.

Nuapada is a district of Orissa, India. Naupada district located in western part of Orissa, lies between 20° 0′ N and 21° 5′ No latitudes and between 82° 20′ E and 82° 40′ E longitudes. Its boundaries extend in the north, west and south to Raipur district in Madhya Pradesh and in the east to Bargarh, Balangir and Kalahandi districts. Its boundaries extend in the north, west and south to Raipur District in Chhattisgarh and in the east to Barhgarh District, Balangir District and Kalahandi district. This district is spread over in an area of 3407.5 sq kms. Generally, climate of Nuapada District is hot and dry; humidity is negligible with scanty rainfall.

2.2 Sampling

Drinking water samples were taken from different villages of Kalahandi and Nuapada districts (Fig-1). After the water samples were transported to the laboratory, fluoride analyses were performed immediately.

2.3 Determination of Fluoride

A combination fluoride electrode was used to determine the fluoride concentrations in drinking water, juice and bottled water samples. The samples and fluoride standard solutions were diluted 1:1 with the TISAB, The solutions, which contained 25ml of the sample and 25mL of TISAB solutions, were mixed with a magnetic stirrer for 3mins. The electrode potentials of the sample solutions were directly compared with those of fluoride standard solutions.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Environmental pollution due to fluoride contamination has serious consequences. Besides the immediately visible syndromes, the effect of this environmental problem can be a syndromes astheria, muscular atrophy, heartburn, joint pain, disfigured teeth, skeletal deformation, osteosclerosis and calcification of ligaments leading to such as hyphosis, stiffness of the spine and bony exostosis (Fig-2a,2b).

Dental fluorosis was observed in 76% out of the 622 children surveyed in the 9 selected villages. More than half the children (325) were suffering from mild dental fluorosis, while 132 were moderately afflicted and 15 were diagnosed with severe dental fluorosis. Skeletal fluorosis was observed in Bastipada and Khandhapada hamlets of Nuamalpada village and in Sukalpur village (Table-1).

Table-2 reveals fluoride concentrations greater than the accepted level of 1.5 mg/l in most of these sources. The highest fluoride concentration found in these sources is 4.0 mg/l in Nuamalpada village. The fluoride content varied from source to source in each village. It was much higher in groundwater sources (hand pumps and open wells) as compared to surface water sources. The high fluoride content in groundwater is probably due to the presence of underground fluoride bearing rocks. Seven villages, namely, Bakalikhuti, Tetelpada, Binapurpada, Putupada, Pharsera, Malpada and Jharbandh have higher concentrations of fluoride in handpumps compared to the open wells. The remaining 4 villages Sukalpur, Amguda, Numalpada and Belgaon have similar ranges of fluoride concentrations

48

Pelagia Research Library

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

in the hand pumps and open wells. This indicates that the former villages contain fluoride in the upper strata rather than the deeper strata of underground rocks. Most of the open wells in these villages exhibited fluoride content below 1mg/L. It was interesting to note that most of these open wells were not used for drinking.

page4image2199698736page4image2199699104

Fig-2(a): Skeletal Fluorosis

Pelagia Research Library

49

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

Fig-2(b): Dental Fluorosis

Four grab samples were collected from tap water in Karalkot, Kerijhola, Binapur and Boden villages which were supplied with piped water by government agencies. The analysis revealed that three of the four samples had fluoride contents around 3mg/L or more. Three out of the four samples were from supplies withdrawn from deep bore wells. These points out that supplying water from deep bore wells may not be a viable solution to the problem. Fluoride concentrations were also monitored in Sundher, Indra and Patal Ganga rivers. All of them had fluoride content below 1mg /L. Hence, these surface water sources can be used for supplying drinking water, after treating them to remove bacteriological contamination (Table-3,4).

50

page5image2237542736page5image2237543104

Fluorosis has spread its tentacles to 283 Villages in 65 Gram Panchayats under Golamunda, Bhawanipatna, Narla and Kesinga blocks during the last few years. Among 10,235 school children in the age group of five to fourteen years surveyed in these villages, 4984 were found to be affected by Dental Fluorosis of different degrees. While

2,966 were found to be suffering from Mild Fluorosis, 1,526 were in moderate category and 492 having severe

Pelagia Research Library

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

problems (Table-5). According to the study, some of the severely affected villages are Dhamanpur, Khaliapali, Limser, Chahaka and Golamunda under Golamunda block, Suknabhata, Ghugurpala, Sargiguda, Ratanpur and Kamegaon villages under Narla block and Sagda, Deypur, Pokharighat, Gohirapadar and Gudialipadar villages under Bhawanipatna block.

Table-1: Dental Fluorosis Status among the Children (from 7 to 16 years age) in Villages Surveyed

page6image2256828384 page6image2256828672 page6image2256829024 page6image2256829312 page6image2256829600

Name of Gram Panchayat

Total Children
Surveyed Mild Moderate +++

105 50 35 1 158 80 38 5 48 26 7 0 90 56 20 1 63 33 8 0 24 18 4 2

27 10 0 0 77 36 4 0 43 14 22 7

Total Nos. %

88 82 122 78 30 71 80 93 44 71 22 75

12 46 40 53 41 96

Name of Village

Baklikhunti Amguda Tentelpada Pharsara Putupada Sukalpur

Jharbandh Malpada Nuamalpada

Status of Different degree fluorosis

page6image2256878112 page6image2256878400

S. No.
Block – Boden

page6image2256881744 page6image2256882032 page6image2256882320 page6image2256882608 page6image2256883152 page6image2256883344 page6image2256883632 page6image2256883920 page6image2256884208 page6image2256884496

  1. 1  Pharsara
  2. 2  Khaira

Block – Senapali

page6image2256890560 page6image2256890848 page6image2256891136 page6image2256891424 page6image2256891712 page6image2256892000 page6image2256892288 page6image2256892576 page6image2256892864 page6image2256893568 page6image2256893760 page6image2256894048 page6image2256894336 page6image2256894624page6image2256894912 page6image2256895200 page6image2256895488 page6image2256895776 page6image2256896064 page6image2256896352 page6image2256896640 page6image2256896928 page6image2256897216 page6image2256897504 page6image2256897792 page6image2256898080 page6image2256898368 page6image2256898656page6image2256898944 page6image2256899232 page6image2256899520 page6image2256899808 page6image2256900096 page6image2256900384 page6image2256900672

1 2

Total

S. No

1

2

3

4

5

Jharbandh Nangalbod

page6image2256909712 page6image2256910000 page6image2256910288 page6image2256910576 page6image2256910864 page6image2256893152 page6image2256911056 page6image2256911248 page6image2256911536 page6image2256911824 page6image2256912112 page6image2256912400 page6image2256912688 page6image2256912976page6image2256913264

4
Table 2: Fluoride Concentration in Village Drinking Water Sources

9

Hamlet (Pada)

Sukalpur

Bakalikhuti

Sargiguda

Madhupur

Bodlapada

Padarpada Jhakarpada Amguda- Bastipada

Jhulapada Bandhpada Tetelpada

Binapurpada

16 479 76

No. of Water Sources

635 323 138

page6image2256946992 page6image2256947280 page6image2256947568 page6image2256947856 page6image2256948144 page6image2256948432 page6image2256948720 page6image2256949008 page6image2256949296 page6image2256949584

Villages

Sukalpur

Bakalikhuti

Amguda

Tetelpada

Binapur

Range of Fluoride Concentration (mg/I)

W Hp Pond

Total No. %

page6image2256966016 page6image2256966304 page6image2256966592 page6image2256966880 page6image2256967168

 page7image2257399552 page7image2257399840 page7image2257400128 page7image2257400416 page7image2257400704 page7image2257400992 page7image2257401280 page7image2257401632 page7image2257401920 page7image2257402208page7image2257402496

*Not found or monitored, W- Open well, Hp = Handpump

When fluoride is naturally present in drinking water, the concentration should not average more than 1.0mg/L. The Indian Council of Medical Research[18] has given the highest desirable limit of fluoride as 1.0mg/L and maximum permissible limit as 1.5mg/L. the Bureau of Indian Standards has recommended the limit of 1.5mg/L.[19] Manufacturers of products for internal consumption generally restrict the F concentration of water to about 1.0mg/L. the effect of F on livestock is same as in the case human beings and should not exceed 2.0mg/L, since excess concentration affects animal breeding and causes mottled teeth of the young animals (Table-6).

52

Pelagia Research Library

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

Traditionally the people in Nuapada district had been using the water from open wells, tanks, riverbeds and hilly steams. Water borne diseases were very common in all the villages till very recent time. With the spread of deep tube wells, in many villages water related diseases have been very much under control. However, to the misfortune of the people in many villages even the tube well waters have been found to be contaminated with several minerals which are harmful to human health. Among such minerals iron contamination is very common. But presence of high quantities of fluoride in some tube well water has posed a very serious problem in this district.

The water quality was classified into 6 categories depending upon its fluoride concentration. The categories are as follows:

A total number of 4702 tube wells and 218 open wells were covered under the survey in all the 5 blocks of Nuapada district. The following table gives the block-wise distribution of wells. The above table shows that out of the 4920 wells and tube wells that were tested for the amount of fluoride contamination, 907 wells (both tube wells/open wells) were found to be having more than the permissible limit. The wells that contained higher quantity of fluoride were declared as very dangerous and it was resolved that the people will not drink water from these wells.

S.No.

Description

Karalkot water Supply Kerijhola Water Supply Binapur Water Supply Boden Water Supply

Fluoride Concentration (mg/I)

0.26 4.18 3.38 2.98

Table-3: Fluoride Concentrations in Tap Water Supply

page8image2257813696 page8image2257813984 page8image2257814336 page8image2257814624

1 2 3 4

S. No.

1 2 3

Table-4: Fluoride Concentrations in rivers

page8image2257823936 page8image2257824352 page8image2257824640 page8image2257824928 page8image2257825216 page8image2257825504 page8image2257825792page8image2257826080 page8image2257826368 page8image2257826912 page8image2257827104

Description

River – Indra near Rajna Village River- Sundar near Konabeer Village Patal Ganga, Natural Stream

Fluoride Concentration (mg/I)

0.45 0.50 0.42

page8image2257845456 page8image2257845744 page8image2257846032 page8image2257846320 page8image2257846608 page8image2257846896 page8image2257847184 page8image2257847472page8image2257847760 page8image2257848112 page8image2257848400 page8image2257848688

Table-5: Dental Fluorosis Facts in Kalahandi

(Report by Sahabhagi Vikash Abhiyan as on 18.11.09)

page8image2257860704page8image2257860992 page8image2257861280 page8image2257861568 page8image2257861856 page8image2257862144page8image2257862432 page8image2257862720

S. No.

1
2 Kesinga

Status of Different degree of Fluorosis
Mild Moderate Severe

865 134 19 30 12 0 135 32 8 1936 1348 465

Total
No. Percentage

1018 23.37% 42 51.85% 175 17.80% 3749 77.84%

Name of the block

No. of G.P .

29 2 11 23 65

No. of villages

145 4 52 82 283

Total school children

4355 81 983 4816 10235

page8image2257906272 page8image2257906560 page8image2257906848 page8image2257907136 page8image2257907424 page8image2257907712 page8image2257908000 page8image2257908288 page8image2257908576 page8image2257908864 page8image2257909152 page8image2257909440

Bhawanipatna

page8image2257911648 page8image2257911936 page8image2257912224 page8image2257912512 page8image2257912800 page8image2257913088 page8image2257913376 page8image2257913664 page8image2257849264 page8image2257913856 page8image2257914048 page8image2257914336 page8image2257914624page8image2257914912 page8image2257915200 page8image2257915488

3

4 TOTAL

Narla Golamunda

page8image2257920240 page8image2257920528 page8image2257920816 page8image2257921104 page8image2257921392 page8image2257921680 page8image2257921968 page8image2257922256 page8image2257922544 page8image2257922832 page8image2257923120 page8image2257923408 page8image2257923696page8image2257923984 page8image2257924272 page8image2257924560

2966 1526 492 4984

page8image2257927536 page8image2257927824 page8image2257928112 page8image2257928400 page8image2257928688 page8image2257928976 page8image2257929264 page8image2257929552

Table-6: Relationship between fluoride concentrations in drinking water and severity of fluorosis

page8image2257940752 page8image2257941040 page8image2257941328

Severity of fluorosis

Non affected
Mild dental fluorosis Moderate dental fluorosis Severe dental fluorosis Skeletal fluorosis

Number of cases

17 109 61 13 30

Average fluoride conc. in drinking water (mg/1)

1.5 2.1 4.2 3.7 5.0

page8image2257969936 page8image2257970224 page8image2257970512 page8image2257970800 page8image2257971088 page8image2257971376 page8image2257971664page8image2257971952 page8image2257972240 page8image2257972528 page8image2257972816 page8image2257973104 page8image2257973392 page8image2257973680page8image2257973968 page8image2257974256 page8image2257974544 page8image2257974832

Table-7: Affected Villages selected for studies

page8image2257980784 page8image2257981072 page8image2257981360

Name of the blocks

Nuapada Komna Boden Khariar Sinapai Total

No. of GPs

29 27 14 18 21 109

No. of affected villages

24 93 53 24 20 214

page8image2258001184 page8image2258001472 page8image2258001760 page8image2258002048 page8image2258002336 page8image2258002624 page8image2258002912 page8image2258003200 page8image2258003488 page8image2258003776page8image2258004064 page8image2258004352 page8image2258004640 page8image2258004992 page8image2258005280 page8image2258005568 page8image2258005856 page8image2258006144 page8image2258006432 page8image2258006720page8image2258007008

Pelagia Research Library

53

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

Sr. no.

No of tube wells/wells covered

Table-8: Blocks showing the tube wells with fluoride contents

page9image2258266560 page9image2258266848 page9image2258267200 page9image2258267488

Name of the block

District total 4920 372 399 114 17 5

Table-9: Affected villages and Gram panchayat of Kalahandi district

Volume of fluoride found
535
1-1.5 1.5-3 3-5 5-6.5 >6.5 25 33 9 1 -

page9image2258290784 page9image2258291072 page9image2258291360

1700

1
2
3
4
5sinapali 660 18311140

Nuapada
Komna 1241 200 190 47 5 3 Boden 794 102 128 40 5 – Khariar 525 27 17 7 2 2

page9image2258307472 page9image2258307760 page9image2258308304 page9image2258308496 page9image2258308784 page9image2258309072 page9image2258309360 page9image2258309648 page9image2258309936 page9image2258310224 page9image2258310512 page9image2258310800 page9image2258311088 page9image2258311376page9image2258311664 page9image2258311952 page9image2258312240 page9image2258312528 page9image2258313232 page9image2258313424 page9image2258313712 page9image2258314000 page9image2258314288 page9image2258314576

Name of the blocks Nuapada Komna Boden Khariar Sinapai Total

Total no. of tube wells surveyed 1700
1241
794
525
660
4920

Affected Affected Affected wells GP villages

68 15 24 445 24 93 275 14 53 55 10 24 64 10 20 907 73 214

Population having high risk 20819 84870 49921 22566 13150 191326

Population already affected

Male Female Total 642 635 1275

page9image2258359280 page9image2258359568 page9image2258359856 page9image2258360144 page9image2258360432 page9image2258360720 page9image2258361008 page9image2258361296 page9image2258361584 page9image2258361872 page9image2258362160 page9image2258362448 page9image2258362736 page9image2258363024 page9image2258363312 page9image2258363600page9image2258363888 page9image2258364176 page9image2258364464 page9image2258364752 page9image2258365040

6562 5303
347 2728 6201 668 477 1145

1158 913 2071

11865

page9image2258373392 page9image2258373680 page9image2258312816 page9image2258373872 page9image2258374064 page9image2258374352 page9image2258374640 page9image2258374928 page9image2258375216 page9image2258375504 page9image2258375792 page9image2258376080 page9image2258376368 page9image2258376656 page9image2258376944page9image2258377232 page9image2258377520 page9image2258377808 page9image2258378096 page9image2258378384 page9image2258378672 page9image2258378960 page9image2258379248 page9image2258379536 page9image2258379824 page9image2258380112 page9image2258380400 page9image2258380688 page9image2258380976 page9image2258381264 page9image2258381552page9image2258381840 page9image2258382128 page9image2258382416 page9image2258382704 page9image2258382992

12503 10054

22557

page9image2258386240 page9image2258386528 page9image2258386816 page9image2258387104 page9image2258387392 page9image2258387680 page9image2258387968 page9image2258388256 page9image2258388544

Table-10: Fluoride Concentration and its effects

page9image2258394592 page9image2258394880 page9image2258395168

Category Quantity(mg/liter)

Remarks

Acceptable Minor risk Risky
Risky
Highly risky
V ery dangerous

page9image2258407904 page9image2258408192 page9image2258408480

1 2 3 4 5 6

<1 1-1.7 1.5-4 3-6 5-6.7 >6.6

page9image2258416144 page9image2258416432 page9image2258416720 page9image2258417008 page9image2258417296 page9image2258417584 page9image2258417872 page9image2258418160 page9image2258418448 page9image2258418736 page9image2258419024 page9image2258419376page9image2258419664 page9image2258419952 page9image2258420240 page9image2258420528 page9image2258420816 page9image2258421104

A survey was undertaken in all the blocks to ascertain the spread and intensity of fluorosis. It also intended to find out the socio-economic condition of the affected people, their loss of income and assets and their current coping mechanisms. For this purpose all the villages in the 5 blocks of Nuapada district were covered.

Table-7 shows the total 109 G.Ps, 214 Villages were affected with fluoride. Out of which 93 from Komna block and 53 from Boden block were severely affected. Tubewells from Nuapada (1700), Komna (1241), Boden (794), Khariar (525) and Sinapali (660) were investigated for fluoride concentration. Out of 4920 tubewells 372 are in the safe range (1-1.5). 399 are moderately toxic (1.5-3.0), 114 tube wells are with high concentration (3.0-5.0) and 22 tubewells are with very high fluoride content (5-6.5>). On the whole 907 villages from 5 blocks were affected with fluoride in different concentrations (Table-8).

In another survey it was observed that male persons were prone to fluorosis in comparison to female. Nuapada district only 22557 are already affected and 191326 population having high risk of fluoride contamination (Table-9).

Traces of fluorides are present in many waters; higher concentrations are often associated with underground sources. In seawater, a total fluoride concentration of 1.3mg/L has been reported[20]. In areas rich in fluoride-containing minerals, well water may contain up to about 10 mg of fluoride per litre. The highest natural level reported is 2800 mg/L. Fluorides may also enter a river as a result of industrial discharges[20]. In groundwater, fluoride concentrations vary with the type of rock the water flows through but do not usually exceed 10 mg/L (Table-10).[21]

The environmental protection Agency[22] recommended a limit of 1.0mg/L of fluoride in irrigation water for continuous use, but up to 1.5mg/L of fluoride for short term use of fine soils. In Orissa ground water is generally quite safe for irrigation purposes and as such no care is required for use of phosphatic fertilizers except in few cases. The defluoridation process includes costly techniques like reverse osmosis and electro dialysis, and also the hit and trial method like deep bore wells, which are not suitable in rural areas. The Nalgonda technique is an economical way for defluoridation[23]. The Nalgonda technique using alum and lime is easily applicable at both the domestic and community levels provided the TDS of water below 1500mg/L and hardness below 250mg/L. Prescribed

54

Pelagia Research Library

Nilalakanth Dash et al Der Chemica Sinica, 2015, 6(1):46-55 _____________________________________________________________________________

quantities of alum and lime are added to raw water and vigorously stirred when fluorides settle as floes. The treated water contains permissible amounts of fluoride.

CONCLUSION

High fluoride in ground water cause health hazard. In Odisha incidence of high fluoride content ground water (>1.5mg/L) is not uncommon in both shallow and deeper water bearing zones. Fluoride data analysis of tube wells, open wells and river water of villages blocks and gram panchayats ranges from 1-6 (mg/L). In majority of the cases 1-1.5 (mg/L) was prevalent. However large number of cases starting from school children to old age people affected with dental and skeletal fluorosis. Most of the ground water samples in study area were found within the drinking water quality standard. The study revealed that rock-water interaction is the major source of fluoride in ground water and very much influenced by local lithology.

Acknowledgement

Authors are thankful to Principal of Panchayat College (Dharmagarh) and Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha for providing necessary infrastructure facilities.

REFERENCES

[1] N. R. C., Food and Nutrition Board. 9th edition, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, 1980. [2] WHO, Guidelines for drinking water quality. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996, 188.
[3] B. K. Handa, Groundwater, 1975, 3(3), 275–281.
[4] V. K. Saxena and S. Ahmed, Environmental Geology, 2001, 40(9), 1084-1087.

[5] A. N. Deshmukh, K. C. Shah and A. Sriram, Gondwana Geological Magazine, 1995, 9 21-29.
[6] S. Rao, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2009, 152, 47-60.
[7] M. A. Anderson, L. W. M. Zelazny and P. M. Bertsch, Crop Science Society of America Journal, 1991, 55(1), 71-75.
[8] F. A. Smith and H. C. Hodge, Airborne fluorides and man. Part I Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 1979, 8(2), 241-245.
[9] G.S. Tailor and C. P. S. Chandel, Nature and Science, 2010, 8(11), 20-26.
[10] J. Fawell, K. Bailey, J. Chlton, E. Dahi, L. Fewtrell and Y. Magara, Fluoride in drinking water (WHO), 2006Available at: www.who.int/oral_health/events/oral%20healtha.pdf.
[11] V. Agrawal, A. K. Vaish and P. Vaish, Curr Sci., 1997, 73, 743–746.
[12] K. Brindha, R. Rajesh, R. Murugan and L. Elango, Environ Monit Assess., 2011, 172, 481–492,
[13] J. Hussain, I. Hussain and K. C. Sharma, Environ Monit Assess., 2010, 162, 1-14.
[14] P. Mamatha and S. M. Rao, Environ Earth Sci., 2010, 61, 131–142.
[15] A. Sethuraman, E. Imam, Tesfamichael and G. Yohannes, J. Mater. Environ. Sci, 2013, 4(4), 520-525,
[16] A. N. Deshmukh, P. M. Wadaskar and D. B. Malpe, Gondwana Geol. Mag. 1995, 9, 1–20.
[17] D. Muralidharan, A. P. Nair and U. Satyanarayana, Curr Sci., 2002, 83, 699–702.
[18] The Indian Council of Medical Research. New Delhi: National institute of science communication, Indian science congress, Food Nutrition and Environment security, The road ahead, 1975,Vol. Series 44.
[19] Bureau of Indian Standards. Indian standards drinking water specification IS 10500, 1991.
[20] W. Slooff, H. C. Eerens, J. A. Janus and J. P. M Ros, Basisdocument fluoriden. Bilthoven, Netherlands, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (Report No. 758474005), 1988.
[21] U. S. EPA, Drinking water criteria document on fluoride. Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Drinking Water (TR-823-5), 1985.
[22] U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. Definition and procedure for the determination of method detection limits. Appendix B to 40 CFR 136 Rev. 1.11 amended June 30, 1986. 49 CFR 43430.
[23] N. E. E. R. I, Defluoridation, Technology mission on drinking water in villages and related water management National Environment Engineering Research Institute.Nagpur 440020, India. 1987.

55

Pelagia Research Library